Beinart chats with friends in high places: Liberal “hawks” like him played a major role in enabling the Iraq debacle
In 2003, the United States launched an unprovoked invasion of Iraq, a country that had neither attacked nor threatened it — and we, and the Iraqis, are still living with the consequences. Going to war in Iraq was made possible — easy, even — for the Bush Administration not only by Republican hawks and neocon extremists (the wannabe Army Corps of Social Engineers) baying for blood, but even more importantly, by supposedly sober and moderate liberal voices — the Peter Beinarts, Ken Pollacks, George Packers and the editors of the New York Times — not only failing to challenge the basic logic of the case for war, but providing their own more elegant (although equally brutal when stripped of their high-minded rhetoric) rationalizations for invading Iraq.
It was the liberal “hawks” and the New York Times, by failing to ask the right questions of the case for war, that did more to make the war a “thinkable” option for America than any neocon. They allowed the question to be posed simply as one of whether Saddam had weapons of mass destruction or not. And because nobody could give an absolute assurance in the negative, the argument became “better safe than sorry”. The liberals and the New York Times offered no challenge, and asked no questions, of the basic assumption that if Saddam had, in fact, had a couple of warehouses full of VX gas and refrigerator full of anthrax, that necessitated launching a war that has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of upward of half a million Iraqis (and thousands of Americans) and left America weaker and more vulnerable.
And the bad news is that they’re doing it again on Iran.
By asking the wrong questions on Iran, and failing to ask the right ones, the liberal media establishment and some of its key pundits are mainstreaming what is in essence an extremist foreign policy option.
The latest example comes in today’s Washington Post, where Ray Takeyh and Steven Simon essentially provide a “how-to-bomb Iran” manual for an Administration less inclined to dress its wars up in cowboy clothing than its predecessor was, but by its actions in Afghanistan showing that it’s no less committed to waging those wars.
To their credit, Takeyh and Simon note that there’s no legal basis for attacking Iran, and that the Administration would have a hard time winning U.N. Security Council authorization for such a move.
the United States has obtained a series of U.N. resolutions censuring Iran not because its legal arguments and foreign policy views have wowed the world, but simply because its European partners have feared that Washington might otherwise take matters into its own hands. These anxieties were more acute during the Bush years, but they have hardly dissipated with new occupants in the White House. From Europe’s perspective, the U.N. process is designed not just to pressure Iran but also to enmesh the United States in cumbersome proceedings that limit its choices.
It may be comforting for Washington to blame China and Russia as the key obstacles to more forceful measures against Iran, but Britain and France — where public opinion is already against participation in the war in Afghanistan — also have little appetite for striking… Washington would have to choose between an international coalition pledging rigorous containment of Iran, and the lonely, unpopular path of taking military action lacking allied consensus.
They recommend that Obama first try further sanctions, and also that he make sure he has the American people behind his decision to launch a war — and also make sure that he had the support of the Gulf Arab regimes. But the most outrageously naive and dangerous bit of logic they offer is this:
As it contemplated the use of force, the administration’s decision-making would be further complicated by the need for a plan to unwind military hostilities and make sure a confrontation did not escalate out of control. The White House would have to signal to Tehran that the U.S. military objective was not to overthrow the clerical regime but to enforce the will of the international community by disabling Iran’s nuclear program. The message would need to make clear that for the United States, hostilities would end with the destruction of Iran’s nuclear facilities, but that if Iran retaliated, Washington would press its attacks until Tehran could no longer respond.
The idea that you can bomb a country and then “make sure the confrontation does not escalate out of control” is, quite simply, bizarre. Of course Iran is going to retaliate, painfully, over years and even decades. Bombing will, as sober heads have warned, almost certainly spark a protracted war with potentially devastating consequences for Iran (its government and people, including its opposition), Israel, the United States (which has hundreds of thousands of troops stationed in Iran’s immediate neighborhood and the wider Middle East. And it’s more likely to make Iran acquire nuclear weapons than to deter it from doing so.
As the Leveretts have noted, the question of bombing Iran is on the table simply because of the fact that Iran is enriching uranium, and the apocalyptic fantasies that Israel and its most passionate backers in Washington attach to that fact. Iran is not believed by US intelligence to be building a nuclear weapon, but to be moving to “breakout capacity”, i.e. the assembly of all the components of a nuclear weapon via a civilian energy program, but not actually building a bomb — what Japan has done, in other words. And it’s not hard to see the appeal for Iran’s leaders of having such capability at hand in a context where three of its key strategic adversaries — the U.S., Israel and Pakistan — are nuclear armed.
The idea that starting a catastrophic war in the Middle East to preserve Israel’s monopoly on nuclear force in the Middle East — which President Obama publicly signed off on during Netanyahu’s recent visit — ought to be unthinkable. But the likes of Simon and Takeyh are making it thinkable. The media war party also seems to accept at face value the claim that the Obama Administration has “tried engagement” with Iran. That’s rubbish. As Gary Sick and others with some understanding of U.S. diplomacy with Iran have noted, no serious and comprehensive attempt to engage Iran in a dialogue on the full gamut of conflicts between the two powers has yet occurred. The U.S. until now has largely confined itself to talking in order to get Iran to heed Western demands on its nuclear program; the only way to stabilize Iran’s relations with the U.S., Israel and the rest of the region will be through a grand bargain that recognizes Iran’s status in the region and regulates its relations with all of its neighbors. Of course Iran’s internal dynamic has made that challenge massively complicated for both sides. But to dodge that challenge and instead launch a war that can only make matters worse seems to be to be criminally insane — insanity enabled by supposedly sober people falsely presenting yet another war of choice as some kind of necessity.
They can’t answer if they are glass. It’s sad that this what Amerika has become, not that we were different in the old days.
Pingback: CFR liberals (again) pushing for another Middle East war? « LobeLog.com
Pingback: Patrick Disney Describes The Day After the US Bombs Iran « LobeLog.com
I think you are misreading the article. I read it more as a thought-experiment, in which the reader is asked to imagine a number of considerations which the Obama administration will think about. And when one does this, the conclusion seems to be: they will NOT attack Iran. I would take this as the opposite of liberal warmongering. It’s just another take (there are SO MANY!) on why attacking Iran is foolish. (They do not talk about the criminality of an attack, which is certainly also obvious.)
I’m afraid that Tony Karon is a bit too soft on what this article in fact portends. The authors are making war against Iran more thinkable, more do-able, more likely to end in our inevitable and morally justified triumph. Listen to exactly what they say:
“But to avoid the grim future postulated here, Iran would have to leave behind its peek-a-boo negotiating tactics and sign up for intrusive inspections and tight limits on its uranium enrichment activities. The record on this score is not encouraging, with decades of sanctions impeding but not blocking Iran’s progress to nuclear weapons capability. Thus, the world imagined here may not constitute destiny — but it will be hard to escape.”
We can tell them what they must do if they want to avoid the “grim future” (they “would have to leave behind…”), but what we decide to do is always right, proper, meet and just.
The insanity of the USA going to war against Iran can be justified on only two grounds: we are insane, or it is destined to happen. The authors choose the second option. Note how every contingency advanced in the article is met with a “but ” – but it would be to our advantage, but it would be disastrous yet necessary, etc., etc. The argument based on “destiny” – whether imagined (which is a human choice) or known (by which time it is too late) – is almost always a false and ultimately self-serving argument.
The obvious fact about the article: the authors fail to exercise any analysis on an option that needs to be considered: Iranians have a bomb, but there are ways to induce them not to ever use it. Which would make them just like us – right?
Charles Molesworth
Pingback: Iran and the Problem with Sanctions « ????? ???
Here again we have an insane proposition being given credence by people who live in fantasy land. Everything that every human does is based on a context: a view of how some situation should operate. Each context produces successful outcomes (the result is viable, and the participants enjoyed the process), or is irrational and produces failed outcomes (the result is non-viable, and the participants did not enjoy the process).
Please, someone tell a single aspect of a rational context that supports it being reasonable for ANY country in the world to tell Iran it can’t have a nuclear weapon?
Until I hear a single aspect of a rational context that supports sanctions on Iran, I will continue to know that all the people behind this insane, lacking in rationality, and fundamental immorality, move are egotists that live in a fantasy world, quite comfortably playing with the lives of American citizens and the rest of the world, just to satisfy their idiotic notions about world conduct and the role of the US in the world, notions that have NEVER ONCE produced a single US government action that benefited one person, somewhere in the world.
Why do the American people continue to follow these fools. Someone, please tell me!
OMG I like this site. love.
The American Industrial/military complex owns America and regardless of the party in power, America is entrenched in war and has been since WWII and will be until China stops her! China on the other hand may find this methodology for keeping factories open and money churning good for her also, and start many festering pus-pits with America such that each sustains the other in a mutual and ugly situation!
Money! Follow the dollar for the answer!
“The authors are making war against Iran more thinkable, more do-able, more likely to end in our inevitable and morally justified triumph.”
Can more?
Oh Tony you are in credible Clever.
On this points i think you are right.
Who Spam comment this web again I will report your website to google to be Deindex.
Tony Karon.
Expensive watch sale
The American Industrial/military complex owns America and regardless of the party in power
What else would you expect a Liberal government.
Razor Dirt Rocket MX350 best Product for kid
think you for article best blog
A good website. The abundance of useful information here. I will send it to several friends ans also share in delicious. And, of course, thank you for Exhaustion for you.
Christmas Decor 2011
Spurs, who were unfortunate to only draw 1-1 with Chelsea last week, found their cutting edge in the second half through Bale.Adebayor, who was a menace to the Norwich defense all game, displayed some impressive close control when surrounded by a cluster of defenders before laying the ball off to Bale, who sidefooted past Ruddy from 10 yards (meters).Adebayor had a goal disallowed for offside in the 66th but Bale made it 2-0 a minute later, running onto a pass from Luka Modric, powering clear of Zak Whitbread before chipping Ruddy.”Winning the title is not impossible – that is all I have ever said,” Redknapp said. “Man United and Man City look so strong but we are up there and we just have to keep picking up points and see where we finish.”
CINCINNATI (AP)Ray Rice had a pair of long touchdown runs Sunday night, steadying Baltimore to a 24-16 victory over the Cincinnati Bengals that gave the Ravens their third AFC North title and the No. 2 seed in the playoffs.See the best Baltimore Ravens action, or check out your favorite NFL team here.Baltimore (12-4) will get a first-round bye followed by a playoff game at home, where the Ravens are 8-0 this season.Despite the loss, the Bengals (9-7) also got into the playoffs, securing the final wild card as the Jets and Broncos also lost.
Running back Rashard Mendenhall is nursing sore ribs while linebacker LaMarr Woodley’s strained right hamstring is fatigued but otherwise OK”It’s patience to the hole, we call it, and then speed throughthe hole,” Schottenheimer said OK, we alreadyknew they were bad”When you play in the 3-4, Mike Wallace Jersey they do so Jonathan Vilma Jersey many things to try to hityou from so many different directions,” Shanahan said Through first seven games, he had 1,739 yards passing, 14 TDs and seven interceptions Also, defensive end Charles Johnson has a sore back and safety Charles Godfrey injured his left shoulder that has been bothering him Twice before, the Broncos failed to make the postseasonKey player: Barwin had his fourth sack of the day, a franchiserecord
logo is the pinnacle of creative brilliance and sums up the BIG IDEA for Aflac But have you ever wondered if babies are born with the
It’s who we areC Fructose (specifically high fructose corn syrup) is the #1 sweetener used Their logo is simple, yet exceptionally valuable to their mission as a company
http://www.orlandomagicjerseysshop.com/
One’s mind features a way of making itself up without anyone’s knowledge, also it suddenly becomes clear what one methods to do.
These days nothing goes to be certain, except death and taxes.
Kindle Schweiz | Kindle Switzerland
I liked up to you’ll obtain carried out right here. The cartoon is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an nervousness over that you would like be handing over the following. sick indisputably come more earlier once more as exactly the similar just about very frequently inside case you shield this increase.
I have learn a few excellent stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much effort you set to create this sort of great informative web site.
Det er dessuten slik at vi studerer tiltak innen kirurgi, medisin,mulberry bayswater, psykiatri og arbeidsrettet rehabilitering hver for seg, for å nevne noe. Du mener vi har tid til å vente på at kjønns-skjevheten i næringslivet bedrer seg, du forstår nesten ikke hvorfor det er såpass vedtatt at denne skjevheten må jevnes ut. Noe som ikke er holdbart for en bil av denne prisklasse,fitflop salg, hvis hovedmarked er USA. Vi er ogs sv forn med at fikk over e
I think that I can say that is a true statement for 99 17, 1977, before his execution, which ended what amounted to a 10-year national moratorium on the death penaltyBut well still smoke and drink and fool around, were nookie-boundMcMaster Engineers!The action by McMaster comes about three months after outraged complaints surfaced over student chants at universities in Halifax and British Columbia? With a squad loaded with?Barcelona players and?just a couple of Madridistas, competing against a D
相关的主题文章： Discipline is what turns your ability into achievement. Without it, your goals will always be daydreams at best. Working out two days last week, five days this week, and three days next week will prevent you from ever reaching your podium. What is missing or what are you tolerating in your life that is preventing you from establishing discipline Does this scenario sound familiar You are right in the middle of your workout at the gy
相关的主题文章： Among the various research areas in Sport Psychology, the most frequently investigated topic is the construct of petitive anxiety. petitive anxiety may have potentially devastating effects on an athlete in performance environments. While examining the relationship between the use of basic psychological skills and the intensity and directional dimensions of petitive anxiety, findings revealed that the participants maintained the int
3 Biggest Troubles Toronto Blue Jays Ought to Address at the Industry Deadline | Bleacher ReportIn spite of their recent battles in June, the Toronto Blue Jays nevertheless hold the top location in the American Little league East and have a Four.5 game guide over the second-place New York New york yankees.While the Blue Jays get looked like a playoff membership for the most part this season, there have also been instances wherever their lack of degree in certain places continues to be exposed an
This site was… how do you say it? Relevant!!
Finally I’ve found something that helped me. Thank you!
Gli utenti che scelgono di testare la nuova funzionalità continueranno infatti a ricevere i soliti risultati di ricerca, la differenza è che ora avranno la possibilità di accedere a pagine separate che mostrano i risultati relativi alle mail inviate o ricevute, e il ventaglio di documenti archiviati in Drive. Emmanuel era conosciuto anche dai dirigenti dell ai servizi sociali della Provincia. Come ricostruisce la sentenza 19358/10, i lavoratori, citando in giudizio l avevano fatto
Jaarlijks kunnen ze veertig tot zestig rapporten maken. Geen is geen optie, liever leugenachtige lariekoek dan realiteit. Voor de lager opgeleiden die wel een diploma hebben vallen de gevolgen mee. De vakbonden in de drie grote steden en medewerkers van de stadsvervoerders willen het kabinet ervan overtuigen af te zien van de verplichte aanbesteding en 120 miljoen euro aan bezuinigingen. Broeken, ik moet weer een vluchtje naar Nederland boeken. De film komt buiten de top 10 op nummer 20 binnen e
Nadat het herstel voorspoedig verliep werd een operatie gepland. Volgens Geert Wilders verkl Schulz met zijn opmerinkingen ”de vrijheid van meningsuiting dood. Klopt, een half jaar na Antonies overlijden. VoH onderschat Twente als hij denkt dat hij daar nog mee kan komen (laat staan afbouwen). Verdacht,marc jacobs vesker, maar natuurlijk nog geen bewijs dat Lee zich heeft laten omkopen. “Na dertien jaar besloten de twee geboren Amsterdammers toch weer samen op te treden. ” Wat het CPB zegt is d
ta ansvar for sykefrav- Det aller viktigste er tiliten mellom arbeidstaker og leder. Politimesteren er i villrede, han finner verken smykkene eller tyven. I likhet med sin forgjenger er «Love in the Future» et profft og behagelig studioalbum for hvite, møblerte hjem, men uten den nerven og lidenskapen man gjerne ønsker fra et soulalbum. – Følger ikke bedrifter tariffavtaler, blir gjerne lønnen lavere, konstaterer Tveita. Hvis han ikke forlater gamle synder,marc jaco
excellent put up, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector
do not understand this. You must proceed your writing.
I’m sure, you’ve a great readers’ base already!
La StampaAndiamoci piano con le generalizzazioni. Oppure, se volete, buttatelo via”. ucciso vicepresidente della RegioneLOCRI (Reggio Calabria) – Il vicepresidente del Consiglio regionale della Calabria, Francesco Fortugno, della Margherita, è stato ucciso con alcuni colpi di arma da fuoco a Locri. Prima di tutto fate un giro sul sito dedicato al cicloturismo per famiglie della Fiab, l’ amici della bicicletta,moncler outlet online, con molti consigli e itinerari. Il messaggio rivolto ai cit
I det førtiseks siders dokument som utgjør 1992-versjonen planlegger man en ny sorden (som riktignok nettopp fikk sitt gjennombrudd etter kommunismens fall, og manifesterte seg, også retorisk, i forbindelse med Golfkrigen). – Allerede på 70-tallet laget han filmer som vil bli stående. Ung,mulberry vesker, single og ennå ikke frustrert? Tough measures adopted by Ethiopian security forces in parts of the country in response to increased security threats and continued
The LARGE drawback is that, statistically, 92% of men over 40 fail at sustaining weight loss
through the use of this basic strategy.
Great web site you have here.. It’s hard to find high-quality writing like yours
nowadays. I seriously appreciate people like you! Take
care!!
Wow because this is very helpfulexcellent work! Congrats and keep it up
Many thanks, this website is extremely valuable
Author Resource: Air jordan 6,nike air jordan 4,Jordan Super Fly,jordan retro shoe,this shoe also has a very nice trimming on its shoe upper panel,the popular brand and the generic style have seemingly not lost a step. Here are two Nike Lebron Shoes iconic rings along with their backstories The newspapers were obsessed Air Jordan XXX White by Geraldine Ferraro’s finances and her family’s alleged connections with the MafiaS”Arcade Fire, Cee Lo Green, Rihanna and Justin Bieber Win at Brit AwardsTh
According to the most recent World Bank projections, Sub-Saharan Africa’s gross domestic product (GDP) development slowed to an estimated three.0% in 2015 from
four.5% in 2014.
Wow, beautiful portal. Thnx ..
NFL 17 http://www.t1-gaming.com/forum/t1new/610-buy-fifa-17-coins-michael-vick-candidate-for-cover-of-upcoming-video-game-that/&last=1
Author Resource: Air jordan 6,nike air jordan 4,Jordan Super Fly,jordan retro shoe,this shoe also has a very nice trimming on its shoe upper panel,the popular brand and the generic style have seemingly not lost a step. Whoopsies Women GEL-Kinsei 6 Black After all, songwriting is in Kesha’s blood: Her mother, Rosemary Patricia “Pebe” Sebert, helped write “Old Flames Can’t Wmns Dunk Sky High Hold a Candle to You,” a hit Mens Adidas Originals NMD in 1980 for Dolly Parton For a group trip to Air Max