- diete on What McDonalds Can Learn from Ford and the Vatican
- changes to your home, home alterations, modify kitchen, bathroom remodel, remake, home refashion, redo kitchen, total home make over, regenerate your home, renew your home, kitchen restore,revitalize your home, better, improve, amend, ameliorate, meliorat on Bush el Libertador? You’re Having a Laugh!
- Alberta on Obama, Foxman and Israel’s Purpose
- bittorrent spartan wars hack for android on Israel Disappoints the Neo-cons in Lebanon Proxy War
- running shoes, on The 8 Fallacies of Bush’s Abbastan Plan
Monthly Archives: February 2010
Those who live behind its walls are still ruled by the Israeli state
The former US president Jimmy Carter set off a firestorm in 2006 when he said that Israel would have to choose between maintaining an apartheid occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and a two-state peace agreement with the Palestinians. That Mr Carter brokered Israel’s most important peace treaty with an Arab country was immaterial; he was branded an enemy of Israel, an anti-Semite and even a Holocaust-denier.
Israel’s friends in the US reacted out of instinct, knowing that an association with apartheid – South Africa’s erstwhile system of racial oppression – would bring international condemnation and isolation. But there was no word of protest from that quarter last week when Israel’s defence minister said what Mr Carter had. “If, and as long as between the Jordan (River) and the (Mediterranean) Sea there is only one political entity, named Israel, it will end up being either non-Jewish or non-democratic,” warned Ehud Barak, speaking at Israel’s annual Herzliya security conference. “If the Palestinians vote in elections it is a binational state and if they don’t vote it is an apartheid state.”
Which, of course, is exactly what Mr Carter was arguing…
…It should come as little surprise that Israelis are cool towards Mr Obama’s peace effort: Israel’s cost-benefit analysis weighs against pursuing a peace agreement that carries risk. There are no consequences for maintaining the status quo. Unless Mr Obama and others can change that cost-benefit analysis, they’re wasting their time.