The Wrong Questions on Iran

Imagine, for a moment, that U.S. troops invading Iraq had, as they neared Baghdad, been fired on by an artillery unit using shells filled VX nerve gas — an attack that would have lasted minutes before a U.S. aircrew had taken out the battery, and may have brought a horrible death to a handful of American soldiers. Imagine, further, that the conquering troops had later discovered two warehouses full of VX and mustard gas shells. And later, that inspectors in a science lab had discovered a refrigerator full of Botulinum toxin or even anthrax.

The Administration and its allies in the punditocracy would have “proved” their case for war, and the media would have hailed President Bush as the kind of Churchillian visionary that he imagines himself to be. And goodness knows what new adventures the Pentagon ideologues would have immediately begun planning.

Now, ask yourself, had the above scenario unfolded and the “case for war” (on the terms accepted by the media and the Democrats) been proven, would Iraq look any different today? Would it be any less of a bloodbath; any less of a quagmire for U.S. troops; any less of a geopolitical disaster; any less of a drain on U.S. blood and treasure? Would the U.S. mainland or U.S. interests and allies worldwide be any safer today? In short, would the Iraq invasion seem any less of a catastrophic strategic blunder had the U.S. discovered some caches of unconventional weapons in Iraq?

The answer to all of those questions is obviously no.

And it’s from that point that we must begin our discussion on Iran, and the media’s role in preparing the American public for another disastrous war of choice. The “necessity” in the American public mind to go to war in Iraq was established through the mass media — a failure for which there has been precious little accounting. But that failure runs far deeper than is typically acknowledged even by critics: It was not simply a case of the media failing to properly and critically interrogate the spurious claims by the Administration of Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction capability. Sure, even the likes of France and Germany suspected that Saddam may, in fact, have still had a few piles of chemical munitions left over from the Iran-Iraq war. The point, however, is that they did not see these as justifying a war. They recognized from the outset that invading Iraq would cause more problems than it would solve.

The more important failure of the U.S. media, then, is its failure to question the basic proposition that if Iraq had, indeed, had unconventional weapons, then an invasion and occupation of that country was a wise and prudent course of action.

Of course many of the decision-makers in the U.S. media in the wake of 9/11 were scared and confused, and looking for John Wayne-style authority figures for comfort — read back now and you’ll find some astounding toadying up to the self-styled tough guys of the Administration: Bill Keller’s wet-kiss profile of Paul Wolfowitz in the New York Times suggested to me a man playing out Robert Mitchum’s epiphany in The Green Berets, the jaded liberal recognizing the harsh truths of John Wayne’s approach to making the world safe for freedom. And Donald Rumsfeld’s loquacious buffoonery created a comforting sense of certainty among a liberal media intelligentsia suddenly desperate to embrace an imperial mythology, and in the case of the George Packers and Peter Beinarts, to render it profound as a narrative of global liberation. Others simply preferred to avoid anything that might have demagogues branding them “un-American,” for fear of losing ad dollars.

That may help explain the failure, but it does not excuse it.

The fact that carnival barkers like Kristol and Beinart continue to be touted as having opinions worth heeding on these matters is ample evidence that the media has either learned little, or else is more dedicated to a kind of edutainment vaudeville than in empowering the American people to make informed foreign policy choices.

Beinart, in a mawkish attempt to account for himself in the excellent Bill Moyers documentary Buying the War, offers up this little gem: “The argument in the fall of 2002 was not mostly about the facts, it was about a whole series of ideas about what would happen if we invaded.”

Exactly. The fact that Beinart and company were wrong on the facts was only part of the problem. More importantly, it was their ideas about the use of force and its consequences that proved so disastrously flawed. And most of the decision-makers in the mainstream media did not bother to challenge the basic proposition that if Saddam had certain categories of weapons, then an invasion was necessary and beneficial.

The very idea that there are certain categories of weapons that draw down a red mist over rational discussion of geopolitical options is an exceedingly dangerous one — that should be one of the key lessons drawn from Iraq. And that’s exactly what’s being cooked up over Iran, too.

The very same crew of neocons and liberal hawks and the Israeli political establishment and its allies in Washington, are goading America to attack Iran. They insist Iran is going hell for leather to acquire nuclear weapons, and allowing it to do so represents a mortal threat to the West, Arab moderates and Israel. And just when a convenient excuse was needed for the U.S. failure in Iraq and Afghanistan, wouldn’t you know it, it’s those darn Iranians “interfering”. Don’t even think about discussing, what, are you Neville Chamberlain or something? Don’t you know it’s 1938 all over again?

Of course, not all of it is as plain silly as the paragraph above.

(For the record:

  • First, there is no evidence that Iran is actually building a nuclear weapon; merely that it is building a civilian nuclear energy program with all elements of the fuel cycle permissible under the NPT that would, in fact, put nuclear weapons easily within reach should they opt to build them.
  • Second, even if Iran did possess nuclear weapons, the idea that it would use them to initiate a conflict in which Tehran would certainly be destroyed is based on tabloid-style alarmism about the nature of the regime in Tehran — in fact, Iran’s Islamic Republic has long proved to be guided more by unsentimental realpolitik than by revolutionary fervor in the pursuit of its national interests and regional influence.
  • Third, Iran is not “interfering” in Afghanistan and Iraq any more than the U.S. is; it has close ties with the dominant Shiite and Kurdish parties that represent three quarters of Iraqis, for whom its involvement in Iraq is welcome. Thus the recent rebuke to Bush by both Karzai and Maliki on the question of Iran’s role in their countries. Even the Administration’s claims that Iran is targeting U.S. troops in Iraq are largely unproven: In a remarkably shallow treatment of complaints about the New York Times coverage of the issue, its public editor concedes simply that the Times should have told readers of its previous coverage to provide “context” — there is no serious questioning of the contention that because Iran has been known to supply the know-how to build “Explosively Formed Projectiles” (EFPs), any time an EFP is used in an attack on U.S. soldiers in Iraq, the perpetrators are an Iranian proxy. This is worth dwelling on, because it’s typical of the ignorance on various issues — the extent of President Ahmedinajad’s authority in Iran, for example — propagated by the Times. A simple technical exposition of what an EFP is reveals that the technology is easily copied by anyone with know-how and access to very basic munitions. It’s not an actual weapon; it’s a method of building an improvised explosive device to pierce armor. The idea that the use of EFPs in Iraq is automatically a fingerprint of Iran is ridiculous. Someone ought to tell the Times. And by the way, even if Iranian proxies were attacking U.S. forces in Iraq, that wouldn’t signal intent to undermine the Iraqi government; it would simply be an escalation of the secret war between Washington and Tehran. And that’s a war that this President, his deepest psychological scars laid bare by his failure in Iraq — a wound that the psychotic Dick Cheney will press and press — may be ready to escalate by launching an attack on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Indeed, it is not Iranian “interference” that Iraq and Afghanistan fear; it is being caught in the crossfire between the U.S. and Iran.
  • 1938? Don’t make me laugh. Nazi Germany was the most powerful military nation on earth, and in 1938 it was poised to invade its neighbors. To make the same claim about Iran is just plain ignorant. )The drumbeat for war against Iran is actually more subtle than it was in the case of Iraq: The Administration denies it wants war and insists it seeks a “diplomatic solution” to the standoff over the demand that Iran cease uranium enrichment. But by “diplomatic solution,” the Administration and its allies simply mean an Iranian surrender to U.S. terms as a result of non-military pressures. There’s no room to question, here, the basic assumption: (a) that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons; (b) that, as Senator John McCain put it, “the only thing worse than going to war with Iran is an Iran with nuclear weapons.”

    McCain delivers that one as if it’s a last word, but it shouldn’t be. He’s trying to effect the familiar demagoguery of narrowing options in the way the Iran issue is defined in U.S. public discussion: If threats and sanctions can’t dissuade Iran from enriching uranium, then military action becomes the “last resort.” The idea that Iran enriching uranium is a “red line” is not questioned. An irreversible slide to war in the U.S. is being carefully constructed by those who are out to persuade the American public that if Tehran refuses to run up a white flag, military action — unfortunate as it may be — becomes essential. And the idea would be to have the outgoing U.S. Administration to do the job, its disregard for law (international and domestic) well established, as is its propensity to orchestrate disaster. The mythology last time around was that invading Iraq would transform the Middle East in a healthy way; this time it is that a “surgical strike” taking out Iran’s nuclear facilities or Revolutionary Guard facilities would settle the matter. Hardly. Iran would respond in an asymmetrical fashion, that would cost many thousands of American lives in Iraq and elswhere over the next decade, might disrupt world oil supplies and more. Together with the Iraq misadventure, it would ensure that the Bush Administration leaves a legacy that might be a latterday equivalent of the Hundred Years War between England and France; an open-ended conflict with the population of most of the Muslim world that the U.S. can’t really win.

    So, the basic question on Iran should be exactly the same one the U.S. failed to ask on Iraq: Will military action against Iran leave the U.S. and its interests and allies in the Middle East in a more secure position or in greater peril. That, really, is the only question that matters.

    There’s very little discussion in the U.S. media of why Iran might seek nuclear weapons, what alternatives it might have — and might choose to use should it be attacked — and whether the environment can be altered to persuade it that it doesn’t need nuclear weapons. What are Iran’s strategic needs, and can they be accomodated in a framework acceptable to others that at the same time accomodates its interests? And so on.

    Intead, we’re essentially asked to believe that Iran wants nuclear weapons in order to destroy Israel and satisfy some sort of doomsday fantasy. The evidence for this is usually misquoted statements from President Ahmedinajad, and suggestions that he is personally inclined towards an eschatalogical world view (as if the same were not true for President Bush!). The fact is that Ahmedinajad does not actually rule Iran, and would never be in a position to decide on the use of nuclear weapons even if the portrait painted of him were true. Iran’s nuclear program has been in place for decades; Ahmedinajad is unlikely to survive the next Iranian election. (Yes, Iran actually holds elections, at least for the presidency — that may be one reason the presidency doesn’t run the country!) And the regime’s primary concern is to ensure its survival, a principle that governs even its proxy activities abroad — for example, it is conventional wisdom even on the right that Hizballah would attack Israel and U.S. targets in response to an attack on Iran; i.e. their purpose in the Iranian strategic doctrine is asymmetrical deterrence.

    It would certainly be quite understandable in the strategic environment in which Iran operates to seek a nuclear weapon; some would argue they’d be stupid not to. After all, three of their arch-rivals, the U.S., Israel and Pakistan have such weapons. And they’ve seen such capability may have helped North Korea evade U.S. military action. The recent U.S. nuclear deal with India, moreover, underscores the fact that Washington is unashamedly selective in applying the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and has always ignored the treaty’s premise, i.e. that other countries would refrain from acquiring nuclear weapons in order to allow those that currently have them to disarm. Disarm? The U.S. is the only nation ever to have visited nuclear terror on another nation, a war crime — yes, it is a war crime to deliberately target a civilian population — the discussion of which is quite simply taboo in America. Instead, in the U.S. it is still acceptable to talk of actually using nuclear weapons: Hillary Clinton castigates Barak Obama for ruling out their use against al-Qaeda in Pakistan or Afghanistan!

    States do not pursue weapons systems as ends in themselves; and states are hardwired to ensure their own survival. It is to that end that they acquire weapons systems, to protect, enhance or advance their own strategic position and even up the odds against more powerful rivals. As everything from the Cold War to the current deal with North Korea demonstrate, the only way to avoid nuclear conflict is to address the concerns and fears on both sides that might spark such a conflict. Weapons systems are dangerous, but not as dangerous as the conflicts that might result in them being used. And we should also get used to the idea that the globalization of technology on the current strategic landscape makes nuclear weapons likely to become the norm among states — after all, the existing eight nuclear weapons states have no intention of relinquishing theirs, so why would any states that anticipate being in conflict with any of them refrain from pursuing those weapons when the opportunity presents itself?

    It is the conflicts that fuel the drive for nuclear weapons that are more dangerous than the weapons themselves, and the problem of those weapons can’t be addressed separately from those conflicts. An Iran bombed to destroy its nuclear power plants would likely be far more dangerous to the U.S. and its allies over the next couple of decades than an Iran that had nuclear weapons within reach might be. The only way to diminish the danger of an escalating confrontation with Iran — which is what bombing its nuclear facilities would certainly do — is to address the conflict between it and its rivals directly, and seek a modus vivendi that can manage their conflicting interests. Iran has shown itself to be ready to engage in such dialogue; it is the Bush administration that has demurred.

    At this stage, the U.S. media corps that facilitated the Iraq catastrophe ought to be asking the question, can the Bush Administration do any worse than it has already done in plunging the Middle East into bloody chaos and in destroying countless American and Arab lives — and doing irreversible damage to U.S. interests across the planet. The answer, of course, is yes, but only if the U.S. media once again enables it.

  • This entry was posted in Featured Analysis, Situation Report, Unholy War. Bookmark the permalink.

    280 Responses to The Wrong Questions on Iran

    1. IOS phones will be able to use this feature in the near future.
      Playable in multiple languages, feel the pride and passion of the game loved around the globe.
      Players can also play against each other with the program’s nifty 2-player hot seat feature.

      Stop by my homepage Cheats For Respawnables

    2. Help yourself find the best applications crowded in App markets as mention:.
      New competitors like Samsung and Motorola are trying to get the market share and somehow they try best for future
      extension Android HTC offering 4G plans with build next generation phones for all major cities and 4G technology such as Wimax network, AT&T’s and
      the latest one is Verizon LTE network. Still, if you pick wisely
      you’ll be able to enjoy some of the finest video games ever created, all
      from the comfort of your Android device.

      Feel free to visit my site :: Jurassic Park Builder Hack

    3. ‘Cameron denies his policies are stuck in the 1980s. There is always a shortage of good tilers in London. Moreover, select based on the decor – simple or
      ornate, colors- bright or subdued, plus the patterns – delicate
      or difficult, pick the kitchen tiles according on your taste.

      My web-site; Tilers Dublin

    4. I do accept as true with all the ideas you have presented on your post.

      They’re really convincing and can certainly work.

      Nonetheless, the posts are very quick for novices.
      May you please prolong them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

    5. What’s up friends, its fantastic article on the topic of teachingand fully defined,
      keep it up all the time.

    6. Excellent blog you have got here.. It’s hard to find high quality writing like
      yours nowadays. I really appreciate individuals like you!
      Take care!!

    7. What’s up Dear, are you actually visiting this website regularly,
      if so after that you will absolutely get good experience.

    8. It’s nearly impossible to find well-informed people in this particular topic,
      but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

    9. 3 miliardów dolarów rocznie do kasy prowincji

    10. says:

      The other limo might have a smaller total dollar amount for 3 hours, does not
      include the driver gratuity and charges on a point-to-point basis.
      No one wants to worry about driving to a meeting
      or to catch a flight. At the very outset, you have to
      be very clear that you will only deal with a company that is well known in the business.

    11. similaire à l’autre Avec des amis jeux , les gens peuvent profiter de jouer contre des personnes différentes en même
      temps et à leur propre rythme . il est facile d’oublier
      le jour de vidéos youtube et Paris Hilton , que nous n’avons pas , en fait , savons intimement ce montant
      à des étrangers . vous pouvez acquérir des démos si vous les aimer vraiment
      avant d’acheter .

    12. I blog quite often and I seriously thank
      you for your information. This article has really peaked
      my interest. I will bookmark your blog and keep checking for new information about
      once a week. I opted in for your Feed as well.

    13. My brother suggested I might like this website.
      He was totally right. This post actually made my day.
      You cann’t imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info!


    14. I’m amazed, I must say. Rarely do I come across a blog that’s both educative and interesting, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail
      on the head. The issue is an issue that not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about.

      Now i’m very happy that I stumbled across this in my hunt for something concerning this.

    15. Vance says:

      With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation?
      My site has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it
      up all over the internet without my agreement. Do you know any techniques to help stop
      content from being stolen? I’d definitely appreciate it.

    16. It’s actually a great and useful piece of info.

      I am glad that you just shared this helpful info with us.

      Please keep us up to date like this. Thank
      you for sharing.

    17. ibcbet says:

      Admiring the dedication you put into your blog and detailed information you present.
      It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that
      isn’t the same outdated rehashed material. Wonderful read!

      I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

    18. I like the helpful info you provide in your articles.
      I’ll bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m quite certain I will learn a
      lot of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!

    19. Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on other blogs?
      I have a blog based upon on the same ideas you discuss and would
      really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my audience would appreciate your work.
      If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

    20. What’s Going down i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It absolutely helpful and it
      has aided me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & assist different users like
      its helped me. Great job.

    21. Hi to every single one, it’s actually a pleasant for me to go to see this web
      page, it includes helpful Information.

    22. This blog was… how do I say it? Relevant!!
      Finally I have found something which helped me. Cheers!

    23. garden says:

      Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images
      on this blog loading? I’m trying to find out if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog.
      Any responses would be greatly appreciated.

    24. hunter game says:

      My brother suggested I might like this website.
      He was once entirely right. This post actually made my day.
      You can not imagine just how much time I had spent for this information!
      Thank you!

    25. Neva says:

      Antiviral remedy The typical, effective and specific
      therapy for genital herpes will be oral antiviral therapy, that is
      usually in tablet contact form. The antiviral drug only
      functions in cells where the herpes virus exists,
      therefore making the drug secure and clear of side effects.

    26. Electricians says:

      Other Methods of Drug Free Pain ReliefThe application ofheat or icecan also be useful if you are right.
      Primarily, the job of electricians have various tasks and related domains in which they work.
      The power developed may be utilized to your gain; you
      may be working as part of theirconditions of insurance.

    27. boob press says:

      Nanny was amazed when Barbara knowledgeable her that Uncle
      Tom moved to Canada six several years back. The fear assault in the delegation sources headed by the union Minister in the room
      late at night on very Thursday night time
      stay forward date within the clarification member that
      their station in the area.

    28. smoke says:

      Richard to Groopman: We understand, it certainly doesn’t
      matter scientifically in case it is the cancer and not the chemo.
      These people told that their sex life is improved as
      they have either stopped smoking completely or reduced the frequency of smoking.
      All these years I have constantly maintained which patients need to be told the truth or offered with enough and
      impartial info to enable those todecide for themselves.

    29. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire actually
      enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your
      feeds and even I achievement you access consistently fast.

    30. Spot on with this write-up, I honestly feel this site needs a lot more attention. I’ll
      probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the advice!

    31. Financial analysts, on the other hand, are assigned to both a product line or business unit.

    32. Sylvia says:

      I’m pretty sure that turned well (at least on the field). ” This was a 20 something young lad who was having fun doing something that he loves. Those who are ready for a change at quarterback aren’t ready for a change in the quality of regular season play the Eagles have enjoyed over the last decade.

    33. Antwan says:

      Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just too wonderful.

      I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what
      you’re saying and the way in which you say it.
      You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep
      it smart. I can’t wait to read much more from you.
      This is really a wonderful website.

    34. Hildred says:

      Tu trabajo solo será añadir buen contenido a tu sitio web y deja que los cupones de Hostgator te ahorren la mayor cantidad
      de dinero posible al contratar tu plan de hosting en Hostgator.

    35. A rare photograph of her half-brother her father’s titles, and
      thievery, which some pepple might point the finger at scapegoats such as
      socioeconomic status, and learning about other conditions.
      Your emotions likely range abc from 10-20 students, with inventory levels
      increasingin the first outpost of civilization.

    36. you’re actually a excellent webmaster. The site loading pace is amazing.
      It kind of feels that you are doing any unique trick.
      Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you have done
      a great process in this matter!

    37. I am really loving the theme/design of your weblog.
      Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility issues?
      A couple of my blog visitors have complained about my site not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera.
      Do you have any tips to help fix this problem?

    38. Hello, this weekend is nice for me, because this point in time i am reading this fantastic informative piece
      of writing here at my home.

    39. You should take part in a contest for one of the greatest websites
      online. I’m going to highly recommend this site!

    40. Howdy I am so excited I found your webpage, I really found you by accident,
      while I was looking on Google for something else, Regardless
      I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a tremendous
      post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design),
      I don’t have time to read through it all at the moment but I have
      book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I
      have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the
      awesome work.

    41. gapgate says:

      This is a very good tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere.
      Simple but very accurate info… Thanks for sharing this one.
      A must read post!

      my website gapgate

    42. Corrine says:

      If you desire to get much from this article then you have to apply these techniques to your won weblog.

    43. reklamy says:

      Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are
      just extremely magnificent. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re
      saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it wise.
      I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is
      really a terrific website.

    44. I am really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility issues?
      A number of my blog readers have complained about my website not operating correctly
      in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any recommendations to help
      fix this problem?

    45. Kareem says:

      Hello, just wated how to gget free membership wizard101 (Kareem)
      say, I likewd this article. It was funny. Keep on posting!

    46. Hello, i believe that i saw you visited my web sige so i got here to go back the choose?.I’m
      trying to inn finding issues to enhance myy web site!I
      suppose its good enough to make use of ome of your concepts!!

    47. ?????? ???? says:

      ?????? ????,?????? ????,?????? ????,??????
      ????,?????? ????,?????? ????,??????

    48. You are so interesting! I don’t suppose I’ve read through a
      single thing like this before. So nice to find someone with some
      genuine thoughts on this topic. Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up.
      This site is something that’s needed on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

    49. If some one desires expert view concerning blogging and
      site-building after that i propose him/her to go to see this webpage,
      Keep up the pleasant job.

    50. kaos wanita says:

      Quality content is the main to invite the users to pay a quick visit the web page, that’s what this web site is

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *