Bush el Libertador? You’re Having a Laugh!

September 11, 1973: Chile’s Presidential palace is
bombed as a U.S.-backed coup overthrows the
democratically elected government

1. Latin America’s 9/11

To understand why President Bush was rebuffed — politely in some cases, less so in others — by the leaders of Latin America at the weekend, it may be worth remembering what September 11 has meant down south along the Andes. It was marked as a dark day by democratically minded people in South America long before 2001 — from 1973, onward, to be precise, because it was on September 11 that year that the democratically elected leftist president of Chile, Salvador Allende, was overthrown in a U.S. backed coup. It was 16 years before democracy was restored, and thousands of Chileans were tortured and murdered simply for their affiliation with parties of the type the Chilean electorate (and the electorates of Argentina, Brazil and others in the neighborhood) have voted into power once again, now that they’re free to choose. We’ll return to the implications in a moment.

2. Bush vs. Chavez and Maradona is “Celebrity Death Match,” Not Real Politics

Much of the U.S. media may have bought into the feeble White House spin portraying Bush’s rebuff by Latin America at the weekend as a points victory over Hugo Chavez (supposedly because despite the tens of thousands of protestors on the streets, the governments agreed to keep talking about trade despite declining to sign on to Washington’s initiative). But Chavez vs. Bush was never the contest, except perhaps in the fantasies of the two men. And spare us march leader Diego Maradona, football genius and legendary cheat, latterday more or less permanent resident of rehab and late night talkshow host. I guess the event did take place a couple of days after Halloween. (Another featured speaker was Evo Morales, the Bolivian coca — as in cocaine — farmer and Chavez acolyte who looks set to be elected president in Bolivia next month).

Chavez, Mardona and Morales are not the face of the Latin American Left, however. That title may be more appropriately used for many of the self-same leaders with whom Bush was conferring behind closed doors at the summit and after. The continent’s electorate has reacted to the failure of free market policies to generate jobs and close the world’s worst income disparities by electing left-wing governments in Latin America’s most economically powerful nations — Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela. Mexico, of course, has a center-right government, but the left is expected to win the next election there, too.

For the governing left in Latin America, Chavez’s antics are a guilty pleasure — the sort of provocative posturing to irritate the Yanquis that only one of their major oil suppliers could get away with . (Frankly, my suspicion is that even Fidel Castro is a little embarrassed by Chavez’s demagoguery — because the Venezuelan leader claims to be mimicking his Cuban hero — but he’s not about to go rebuking the man who controls his own lifeline to cheap oil, now is he?)

Autarchy is not an option for those without massive oil incomes, and nobody’s about to try and reprise the Cuban model, which was a creature of time and place (enabled, to a large extent, by an $8 billion annual Soviet subsidy that translated into an annual stipend of close to $1,000 per citizen). And besides, Latin America’s new leftist governments are quite different from Castro in their approach to questions of democracy — it was in civil society that they regrouped in the wake of the repression of Pinochet and others, so they’re products of a reality quite at odds with the authoritarian party culture of Cuba. And the governing Left is all too aware of the need to not only remain plugged in to the global economy, but to expand that integration by attracting billions of dollars of investments.

So while they may be as implacably opposed to the Bush agenda as Chavez is, they have to remain at the table and negotiate for better terms. Of course, they’re aware that their economic prospects are not only tied to their ability to deal with the U.S. They’re hedging mightily by dramatically expanding their trade and investment links with the European Union, and particularly with China. (Nowhere is the extent to which U.S. influence has declined during the Bush years as evident as it is right now in its old “back yard.”) But they can’t simply walk away; they need to engage with corporate America.

3. For the Latin Ameican Left, Chavez’s Antics are a Guilty Pleasure

They don’t identify with his personality cult demagoguery or his authoritarian streak. but Latin America’s mainstream leftists have to take a certain guilty pleasure in Chavez’s ability to get up the nose of the Yanquis. If he’s a Mandela figure, it’s Winnie rather than Nelson. But he sure is annoying Bush, and they’ll look warmly on his defiance of U.S. influence in the region. (Because in their very bitter experience, U.S. influence in the region has not been a good thing.) Indeed, the Chavez effect right now may actually echo the Castro effect of the past four decades, where even center-right governments in Latin America respected and admired the Cuban leader for refusing to buckle to U.S. pressure. It went beyond ideology to a kind of nationalist sentiment.

While Chavez played bad cop along with Maradona out in the streets, the likes of Kirschner, Lula and Lagos could play good cop inside the summit.

4. Does Bush Think Latin Americans are Stupid, or Just Amnesiac?

“Only a generation ago, this was a continent plagued by military dictatorship and civil war,” Bush intoned in Brazil on Sunday. “Yet the people of this continent defied the dictators, and they claimed their liberty… Freedom is the gift of the Almighty to every man and woman in this world — and today this vision is the free consensus of a free Americas.”

Right, and where was Washington? Many of the same leaders with whom Bush met at the summit were in prison, or buried their friends and colleagues murdered for their activism, and faced the constant threat of murder and torture for standing up to dictatorship. And in most instances, they were fighting dictators backed by the United States.

Chile’s President Ricardo Lagos is a case in point: He was imprisoned by Washington’s man, Pinochet. Yes, he wants a trade deal with the U.S. But you can hold the democracy lecture, thank you.

Whereas President Clinton had the good grace and sense to recognize the harm done by his predecessors in Latin America and apologize for U.S. failures to apply its own values in dealing with the continent, Bush has simply reverted to type. His national intelligence czar, for example, is John Negroponte, better known in Latin America for his years running some pretty nasty covert operations out of the U.S. embassy in Tegucigalpa and covering up human rights abuses by the U.S. backed Honduran security forces. His Middle East adviser is Elliott Abrams, veteran of the Iran-Contra scandal. He nominated hardline Cuban exile veterans such as Otto Reich to top positions in the State Department concerning Latin America, and nobody in the region was surprised that, despite the democratic consensus praised by Bush, the administration appeared to initially support or at least accept a coup attempt against Chavez a couple of years ago.

Either Bush just doesn’t get it, or he doesn’t care: For many of the leaders of the new democracies whose emergence he praised last weekend, the United States does not symbolize freedom and democracy. Indeed, in the tradition of September 11, 1973 — which Bush doesn’t appear to be inclined to publicly repudiate, even if he’s moved on from them — Presidents Kirschner, Lula, Lagos and Andrés Manuel López Obrador (likely next president of Mexico) would once have had more reason to expect to be overthrown in U.S.-backed coups than to be negotiating trade deals with Washington. So, yes, much has changed — but on both sides of the equation.

This entry was posted in 99c Blogging. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Bush el Libertador? You’re Having a Laugh!

  1. President Clinton are good in Judgement – I swear !!!

    Tony Frankern @ Gigapod Labs

  2. I cheer obama than clinton.

  3. kirtasiyecim says:

    America always to its own national interests from interfering in other countries kaç?nmad?. Long-term plan in the Middle East is a part of the problem. Latin America and know that the subject might be, but you will always have this type of events. Impact until 1980, America has backed turkey. What happened to the turkey was back to democracy. In America today announced it is doing against the spread of the communist regime.

  4. Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed!
    Very helpful info particularly the last part 🙂 I
    care for such information much. I was seeking this
    certain information for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

    Here is my site; max diet comprar

  5. Hello there, only notice your website via The search engines, observed that it’s truly beneficial. Let me be aware pertaining to the town. I will be happy in the event you carry on this particular in the future. Most people will likely be helped from the producing. Many thanks!

  6. Remember how the team has to sketch out the ideas and then imagine
    these to actually get the whole map of the dream.
    With the use of a professional tradesman all you need
    to is provide a sort of idea as to what you want
    and the contractor will do the rest, from design,
    execution plan implementation and finally any post sale support that you may require.

    DIY demolition can knock down the cost of remodeling
    as much as 20% which can free up cash for other upgrades.

    Feel free to visit my web page: changes to your home, home alterations, modify kitchen, bathroom remodel, remake, home refashion, redo kitchen, total home make over, regenerate your home, renew your home, kitchen restore,revitalize your home, better, improve, amend, ameliorate, meliorate,converted rooms,reclaim

  7. diamond says:

    I go to see each day a few sites and information sites to read posts,
    but this webpage offers quality based posts.

  8. Familia says:

    I completely agree with Charlie. Don’t let this fool you, I think no maettr where you are, you can still find things to appreciate. The journey is not flat, and you can’t expect that same high level of excitement every single day, why not take the time, step back, and enjoy the most basics of life? I am sure the cuisine is unique where you are, I am sure the locals have personality you can’t find anywhere else, I am sure there gotta be something in the art and music scene that you and Glenn will enjoy. As a reader, I totally want to read about them, remember it is a privilage for what you are doing now, treasure it like you promised yourself before the trip began.Cheers.

  9. I am really glad to glance at this website posts which
    consists of lots of valuable facts, thanks for providing
    these kinds of statistics.

    My website implications liverpool

  10. Simply wish to say ʏour artіhlᥱ іѕ аѕ
    ɑmaᴢing. Ƭɦe ϲⅼᥱaгneѕѕ ііn yοսг pߋst іs јuѕt
    ǥгаt and i cοսⅼɗ ɑѕsսmе үοս агᥱ
    an ᥱxpегt οn tҺѕ sսЬjеct.
    Ϝіne ᴡitһ үuг регmiѕsіⲟn lеt mme
    tο ցɗaƄ
    үߋᥙr feeɗ tο кееρ ᥙρ to ɗɑte
    աitҺ fortɦcomіng ροѕt.
    Ƭhаnkѕ ɑ mіⅼlіߋn and рlеaѕᥱ cɑггy оn thе
    еnjⲟyɑbⅼе ԝⲟгҝ.

    ᕼᥱгe iѕѕ mу ρaɡe ::
    Whale watching holidays sri lanka

  11. hey says:

    If some one needs to be updated with most recent technologies afterward he must be visit this web site and be up to date every day.|

  12. Thanks , I have just been looking for info approximately this topic for a while and yours
    is the greatest I have found out so far. But, what about the conclusion? Are you
    sure about the supply?

  13. Hello, constantly i used to check webpage posts here early in the morning, as i love to find out more and more.|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *