RSSLosing Afghanistan (It Can’t Be Won)
The Taliban hanged Najibullah, the last Soviet-backed Afghan president, in the streets of Kabul in 1996
This from my op ed in The National earlier this week:
Back in April, Afghanistan’s president, Hamid Karzai, dodged a bullet. A fusillade of them, actually, plus a few rocket-propelled grenades, when a ceremony he was addressing came under Taliban attack in the heart of Kabul. Nato spin-doctors immediately dismissed the incident as a case of the Taliban getting lucky. Such increased reliance on terror attacks, they insisted, were signs that the Taliban had grown desperate, having been forced onto the back foot by effective Western counterinsurgency.
Similar sentiments were expressed last week – a week in which Britain’s casualty toll for its Afghan mission passed 100 – after Taliban fighters attacked Kandahar prison and freed 400 of their comrades, and began to take control of a string of villages around the southern city that had once been their spiritual capital.
No amount of wishful thinking can hide the reality, however, that six and a half years after the US-led military intervention that scattered the Taliban, the presence of some 50,000 Nato troops has not prevented the movement from regrouping and mounting a resurgence that has sabotaged plans to rebuild the country on Western-friendly terms.
There may have been a symbolic irony in the April assassination attempt on Karzai: it occurred during a speech to celebrate the 16th anniversary of the fall of Najibullah, the leader of the last Soviet client regime in Kabul, who was butchered when the Taliban arrived. Because Karzai’s situation is not unlike that Najibullah’s…
The Latest
If I Was a Blogger...
... on Lebanon/Iran democracy claims
Elliot Abrams isn't telling you the whole truth about Lebanese democracyGuest Columns
The Pathologies of Israel's Guilty Conscience
Guest Column: Eitan Bronstein The proposal to legally bar the commemoration of the Nakba on Israel's Independence Day reflects growing trepidation in Israel about the inevitable encounter with the Palestinian Nakba and the understanding that the Nakba is a foundational part of Israeli identity....Glancing Headers
The Shebab, the Shahids and the Champion's League Final
The Shebab gunman on the left appears to be a Gunner, i.e. an Arsenal fan... In honor of today's Champion's League final, I republish my op ed that ran in the National a year ago. What was most fascinating about the photograph of the Somali gunman who was part of the crowd dragging the body...Annals of Globalization
The Shebab, the Shahids and the Champion's League Final
The Shebab gunman on the left appears to be a Gunner, i.e. an Arsenal fan... In honor of today's Champion's League final, I republish my op ed that ran in the National a year ago. What was most fascinating about the photograph of the Somali gunman who was part of the crowd dragging the body...99c Blogging
Is Israel Planning to Provoke Iran?
My, oh my, where would we be without a free press in Israel? Haaretz's Aluf Benn today not only outlines how Netanyahu is continuing to build momentum -- and public expectation -- for war with Iran, but he also offers some insights into just how the Israelis might go about positioning themselv...Featured Analysis
Why Obama Must Shackle Bibi
Without any sense of irony, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told fellow paranoiac Jeffrey Goldberg that Iran is ruled by "an apocalyptic messianic cult." Yet, as Goldberg makes clear, perhaps inadvertently, Netanyahu himself is guilty of the same: His view of Iran as simply the latest ...Unholy War
Israel's Apartheid Anxiety
Israel fears being targeted by a grassroots boycott movement of the type that was so effective in pressuring South Africa to end apartheid In a remarkable interview last November, the Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert cautioned that unless it could achieve a two-state solution quickly, Israel...The Whole World's Africa
Congo's Not Africa's WWI, It's Worse Than That
If there is a European analogy to be applied in the Congo, it would be the brutal Thirty Year War in Germany that ended in 1648Shameless Cronyism
Embedded with the Jihadis
My crazy friend Nir Rosen goes on embed with the Taliban, and finds out just why the U.S. can't win in AfghanistanRebellion Into Money
Why Joe Strummer Was a Socialist
Hint: It had nothing to do with bailing out banksA Skeptical Read
All the Hysteria That's Fit to Print, Take II
Now the New York Times wants you to take seriously the idea that the prime issue for the American voter is the danger of al-Qaeda acquiring nuclear weapons. Oh, grow up!Could Die Laughing
Whatever Became of that Nice Mr. Blair...
The problem with a global conversation between Muslims and Christians refereed by Tony Blair? Two words: Tony Blair.Hear! Hear!
Bush's 'Peace' Effort Imperils Peace
Daniel Levy explains why the farcical negotiations between Olmert and Abbas actually undermine the prospects for Mideast peaceA Wondering Jew
Israel is 60, Zionism is Dead, What Now?
Israel at 60 is an intractable historical fact. It has one of the world's strongest armies, without peer in the Middle East, and its 200 or so nuclear warheads give it the last word in any military showdown with any of its neighbors. Palestinian militants may be able to make life in certain parts...The 51st State
A Teachable Moment in Basra
It should come as no surprise that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's disastrous offensive against the Mahdi Army of Moqtada Sadr in Basra has had the exact opposite effect of that intended -- strengthening rather than weakening Sadr, and making clear that he, and the Iranians, have far greater in...Futures Market
Will Russia Partition Kosovo?
Why my tea-leaf reading suggests that Moscow has a nasty surprise in store for Washington in the BalkansCuisine
Yummy yummy Umami
Why a leftover lamb bone turned a bean stew into an ecstatic eventHousekeeping
'Lost' Entries on Rootless Cosmopolitan
Previous entries that now register as "not available" are ones that got left behind in a server migration. We're working on retrieving themNew York Moments
The Debka Made ‘Em Do ItFrom Tony's Archive
A Playground Lesson for Bush
How a spontaneous alliance of jocks, do-gooders and lesser bullies against the biggest bully at the school changed the balance of power at Milnerton Primary
7 Responses to “Losing Afghanistan (It Can’t Be Won)”
Ok Tony, No argument with your analysis - but what to do next? That is the question
I wish someone would ask the presidential candidates, “Why are we in Afghanistan?” I bet they don’t know the answer.
It’s certainly not terrorism.
Pakistan still remains the best place for would-be terrorists to train. (Although… maybe some day, someone will explain to me why the caves of Wajiristan are the best places to learn how to hijack airplanes or bomb subways, but I digress.)
NATO’s presence seems straight out of a Dino Buzzati novel. They probably wake up every morning thinking, “What the hell I am doing here?”
History books will note that the world’s mightiest military organization, NATO, fought only one war in its existence. And it lost it!
My hunch is that the main justification for the war in Afghanistan is to weaken Russia and avoid Central Asia to be cut up into two spheres of influence, Russian and Chinese.
Only 1 minor disagreement with Tony. Pakistan’s support for the Taliban is only secondarily related to India.
The Taliban has (I guess, technically, one should really say “have”) been heavily Pakistanized since the US moved in. Its real support is Waziristan, a region that one day could secede from Pakistan. Islamabad is allowing that relationship to flourish as a way of placating its tribal regions. (Actually, every time its army tried to impose its will, it got thoroughly beaten.)
All those who have ever invaded Afghanistan know, that all roads lead to Afghatinan but none out of it.
“Why are we in Afghanistan?”
Because if we leave, the Taliban will control 75% of the country rather than 25%, and Karzai will be the one dangling over the street.
I didn’t say there was a *good* answer, but that’s the answer.
Afghanistan is actually not Iraq. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, we actually do have popular support. Not to say that the people there love America, but they also don’t love the Taliban.
Just compare the recent offensives in Kandahar, Pashawir, and Sadr City. The Taliban massed troops in Kandahar and Pashawir last week, but both these invasions failed. In neither did they have strong popular support. In this sense it is different from Iraq. In Iraq, when the U.S. invaded Sadr City, the Mehdi Army had the support of the local population and had “home field.”
Also, a lot of the reason the Taliban were gaining in Afghanistan was that they had a base in Pakistan. This was because Musharraf had been following the Zia al-Haq model of statebuilding, and rigging elections so MMA won despite having under 30% support in Waziristan. As Musharraf has lost power and actual real elections have taken place, this dynamic is changing against the Pakistani Taliban. This undermines a key base of support for Afghani Taliban.
The only question is whether it’s enough. To me, it seems very much up in the air.
Goodness. It just dawned on me. Is it possible that the Afghan government is helping to hide bin Laden to keep the U.S. in country?
This is a very distressing scenario. The Afghan government is torn between their ideals and having to deal with extremists.
Leave a Reply