RSSRosner, Haaretz’s Itchy Beard
For a few years, I’ve wondered why Haaretz, an otherwise excellent newspaper, gives such an expansive platform to the infantile right-wing nationalist doggerel of Smuel Rosner, apparently their blogger-in-chief. But I think I’ve begun to understand it: With the right-wing nationalist cranks of CAMERA and other shock troops of AIPAC are doing their utmost, in the name of “supporting Israel,” to close down the English language web site of the country’s best newspaper, maybe they decided that they need Rosner as a beard — or, perhaps in this instance, beard-and-crocheted yarmulka… Whatever it takes, I suppose.
But the beard appears to be starting to itch. As the moral and political midgets that lead Israel today rushed to denounce Jimmy Carter for doing the grownup thing and opening talks with Hamas, the editors of Haaretz pulled no punches, telling them in a stern editorial why Jimmy Carter should be given the royal treatment by Israel. Noting that none of Carter’s detractors had achieved anything close to what he has done in bringing Israel to peace with its neighbors, the editors wrote:
The boycott (of Carter by Israel’s leaders) will not be remembered as a glorious moment in this government’s history. Jimmy Carter has dedicated his life to humanitarian missions, to peace, to promoting democratic elections, and to better understanding between enemies throughout the world. Recently, he was involved in organizing the democratic elections in Nepal, following which a government will be set up that will include Maoist guerrillas who have laid down their arms. But Israelis have not liked him since he wrote the book “Palestine: Peace not Apartheid.”
Israel is not ready for such comparisons, even though the situation begs it. It is doubtful whether it is possible to complain when an outside observer, especially a former U.S. president who is well versed in international affairs, sees in the system of separate roads for Jews and Arabs, the lack of freedom of movement, Israel’s control over Palestinian lands and their confiscation, and especially the continued settlement activity, which contravenes all promises Israel made and signed, a matter that cannot be accepted. The interim political situation in the territories has crystallized into a kind of apartheid that has been ongoing for 40 years. In Europe there is talk of the establishment of a binational state in order to overcome this anomaly. In the peace agreement with Egypt, 30 years ago, Israel agreed to “full autonomy” for the occupied territories, not to settle there.
These promises have been forgotten by Israel, but Carter remembers.
And, of course, Haaretz, representing the grownup trend in Israeli politics, knows that, as Rob Malley and Hussein Agha so eloquently explain, pursuing a peace process that excludes Hamas is not just futile, it’s actually deeply damaging to the prospect for peace.
The beard doesn’t agree. Representing the teenage logic of the Bush Administration and the AIPAC crowd, he scolds his editors and urges them to “just say no to Carter.” Everybody hates Carter, didn’t they know? And he lives only to undermine Israel. His apartheid comparison, with which anyone (including the Haaretz editors) who knows anything about apartheid and the conditions of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank finds little quarrel, is based on “a concoction of exaggerations, inventions, distortions and lies.” Don’t know who’s more mordantly funny, this guy or the Australian with the undertaker’s voice, Mark Regev, who flaks for the Israeli foreign ministry.
If nothing else, the presence of Rosner’s cranky right-wing nationalism on the Haaretz site is testimony to the paper observing best tradition of openness to a diversity of op-ed opinion. But it’s also an argument for mixing things up a little more.
The Latest
Glancing Headers
Waxing Brazilian on Euro 2008
The lesson for South Africa is clear. Our talent pool is so piss-poor that Brazilian coaches won't help -- we need to learn from the Europeans and import Brazilian players!Could Die Laughing
Whatever Became of that Nice Mr. Blair...
The problem with a global conversation between Muslims and Christians refereed by Tony Blair? Two words: Tony Blair.The Whole World's Africa
Stop South Africa's Pogroms!
Violence against immigrants in South Africa may be a product of poverty, but my friend Ray Hartley argues, the only answer is to make them full and equal citizens99c Blogging
Hamas as 'Willie Horton'
By insisting that he never advocated talking to Hamas, Obama digs himself a hole -- anyone who seeks peace in the Middle East will have to talk to HamasHear! Hear!
Bush's 'Peace' Effort Imperils Peace
Daniel Levy explains why the farcical negotiations between Olmert and Abbas actually undermine the prospects for Mideast peaceFeatured Analysis
About That 'New' Middle East...
Could there be a more perfect image of the catastrophic self-inflicted rout suffered by U.S. Middle East policy under President George W. Bush? This week, the President will party with Israel's leaders celebrating their country's 60th anniversary -- and champion a phony peace process whose explici...A Skeptical Read
Beheading Barack
First, he couldn't be President because he's Muslim. Now, we're told, he can't be President because he's not Muslim enough!Shameless Cronyism
Sound Advice for the Next President
To grasp the challenge facing U.S. foreign policy, read Helena Cobban's new book Engage!A Wondering Jew
Israel is 60, Zionism is Dead, What Now?
Israel at 60 is an intractable historical fact. It has one of the world's strongest armies, without peer in the Middle East, and its 200 or so nuclear warheads give it the last word in any military showdown with any of its neighbors. Palestinian militants may be able to make life in certain parts...The 51st State
A Teachable Moment in Basra
It should come as no surprise that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's disastrous offensive against the Mahdi Army of Moqtada Sadr in Basra has had the exact opposite effect of that intended -- strengthening rather than weakening Sadr, and making clear that he, and the Iranians, have far greater in...Futures Market
Will Russia Partition Kosovo?
Why my tea-leaf reading suggests that Moscow has a nasty surprise in store for Washington in the BalkansGuest Columns
Iraq and U.S. Faith in Violence
Guest Column: Alastair Crooke warns of a dangerous fantasy that persists in Western capitals in which the West faces an "onslaught" from "radical Islam." The problem is that this intersects all too tragically with a the persistent belief in Washington and elsewhere that by applying its overwhel...Cuisine
Yummy yummy Umami
Why a leftover lamb bone turned a bean stew into an ecstatic eventHousekeeping
'Lost' Entries on Rootless Cosmopolitan
Previous entries that now register as "not available" are ones that got left behind in a server migration. We're working on retrieving themUnholy War
U.S. Pours Gasoline on Gaza Fires
Once upon a time, Israelis and Palestinians looked to the U.S. to intervene at moments of heightened confrontation to mediate between the two sides and contain the damage. The Bush Administration, however, has proved entirely incapable of playing this role, because its own interventions are hidebou...Annals of Globalization
Honey, I Shrank the Superpower
In a snide reference to Bill Clinton's 1992 promise to "build a bridge into the 21st century," Barack Obama recently quipped that what Hillary Clinton really offers is a bridge back into the 20th century. Yet, a bridge back into the last century may be what all the major candidates are offering when...New York Moments
The Debka Made ‘Em Do ItFrom Tony's Archive
A Playground Lesson for Bush
How a spontaneous alliance of jocks, do-gooders and lesser bullies against the biggest bully at the school changed the balance of power at Milnerton PrimaryRebellion Into Money
The Rebel Grace of Patti Smith
4 Responses to “Rosner, Haaretz’s Itchy Beard”
Rosner is from the “time is on our side” school. Let’s spend the next 20 years deciding if Palestinians respond positively to our generous offer to decrease the number of checkpoints from 520 to 515. Then, in another 20 years, if their learning curve is steep enough, the Palestinians might even enjoy the full benefits of a mere 510 checkpoints. I am sorry but before we can go to 505 checkpoints, Palestinians will have to show responsible governance. If they don’t even behave when they’re in prison, then just imagine how they’ll be once they’re free.
Why is Haaretz going all the way to Europe to find the roots of a binational state? They’re right there in Palestine. I know polls show that only 25% of Palestinians support the idea but it’s quickly gaining ground among the elite.
I read that story of Rosner’s & rolled my eyes: “There he goes again.” I can’t think of any Israeli journalist I detest more. And to think of the distinguished tradition of DC correspondents Haaretz has had: Amos Elon & Akiva Eldar among them. Rosner is the dregs. And he’s covering one of Haaretz’s most important beats.
BTW, the Haaretz site features a video Q&A w. David Landau in which Landau is curiously ambivalent in his questions of Carter. I’m wondering whether Amos Schocken may’ve played a direct role in this editorial. What I read in the editorial couldn’t have been written by the Landau I heard in that video.
In the secret corridors of power, and they are secret, peopled with faces and names none of us know.
There is the understanding that the Jews are one nation.
The right, the left, the zealots, and the assimilated should all share the same spaces.
I suspect it is untenable.
But there are currently no holds barred. Herded together with no where to run. Left to pontificate. This too shall pass.
“For a few years, I’ve wondered why I have always believed Haaretz uses Rosner’s views to make any and all liberal articles seem rational and realistic, as they are, when compared to his views!
Rosner uses Haaretz reputation to insure no person will say his knitting of words produce only rationalizations and cognitive dissonance in the light of reason.
This is comparable to the swindlers story about the King’s clothing in the fairy tale “The Emperor’s New Clothes”.
Thus both have a win-win relationship. What we the reader have with his writing there is for each reader to consider.
Leave a Reply