RSSWhat Makes Groups ‘Special’?
Anywhere you look in the media covering Iraq today, you’ll find tales of the U.S. and Iraqi government forces targeting not the Mehdi Army of Moqtada Sadr, but the “Special Groups.” This capitalized designation refers, ostensibly, to “rogue” units of Sadr’s army, who have been taken over by Iran. Ambassador Ryan Crocker even refers to them as the “so-called ‘Special Groups’.” So-called by whom?
Well, according to Gareth Porter, the term “Special Groups” is not one used by any of the Iraqi forces or by the Iranians, it’s a term coined by the U.S. military. And Porter suggests there’s plenty of reason to be skeptical not just of the term, but of the notion it implies, i.e. that those fighting the U.S. and government forces in Basra and Baghdad are not part of the Mehdi Army, but are instead proxies of Iran.
What never ceases to amaze me, though, is how quickly the U.S. media embraces terminology tossed out — often with a politically loaded agenda — by the U.S. military. Indeed, much of the U.S. media has already dispensed with the quote marks. Do a search on google news and see for yourself.
The Latest
The Whole World's Africa
Congo's Not Africa's WWI, It's Worse Than That
If there is a European analogy to be applied in the Congo, it would be the brutal Thirty Year War in Germany that ended in 164899c Blogging
U.S. Getting Real on Hamas?
Hamas leader claims indirect contact from Washington. About time, too!Featured Analysis
Iraq: Why the End is in Sight
The war in Iraq is drawing to a close -- and hardly on the terms of those who initiated it. It's end is being hastened by Iraqi democracy, and by the retrenchment of U.S. power globally, accelerated by the sharp economic downturnShameless Cronyism
Embedded with the Jihadis
My crazy friend Nir Rosen goes on embed with the Taliban, and finds out just why the U.S. can't win in AfghanistanRebellion Into Money
Why Joe Strummer Was a Socialist
Hint: It had nothing to do with bailing out banksGlancing Headers
The Liverpool-Iraq Connection
Both Liverpool FC and Iraq were acquired with borrowed moneyGuest Columns
Israel Gets Real on Iran
Trita Parsi: In public, Israeli leaders have spoken in apocalyptic terms of Iran's nuclear program, but among themselves, they know better.A Skeptical Read
All the Hysteria That's Fit to Print, Take II
Now the New York Times wants you to take seriously the idea that the prime issue for the American voter is the danger of al-Qaeda acquiring nuclear weapons. Oh, grow up!Could Die Laughing
Whatever Became of that Nice Mr. Blair...
The problem with a global conversation between Muslims and Christians refereed by Tony Blair? Two words: Tony Blair.Hear! Hear!
Bush's 'Peace' Effort Imperils Peace
Daniel Levy explains why the farcical negotiations between Olmert and Abbas actually undermine the prospects for Mideast peaceA Wondering Jew
Israel is 60, Zionism is Dead, What Now?
Israel at 60 is an intractable historical fact. It has one of the world's strongest armies, without peer in the Middle East, and its 200 or so nuclear warheads give it the last word in any military showdown with any of its neighbors. Palestinian militants may be able to make life in certain parts...The 51st State
A Teachable Moment in Basra
It should come as no surprise that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's disastrous offensive against the Mahdi Army of Moqtada Sadr in Basra has had the exact opposite effect of that intended -- strengthening rather than weakening Sadr, and making clear that he, and the Iranians, have far greater in...Futures Market
Will Russia Partition Kosovo?
Why my tea-leaf reading suggests that Moscow has a nasty surprise in store for Washington in the BalkansCuisine
Yummy yummy Umami
Why a leftover lamb bone turned a bean stew into an ecstatic eventHousekeeping
'Lost' Entries on Rootless Cosmopolitan
Previous entries that now register as "not available" are ones that got left behind in a server migration. We're working on retrieving themUnholy War
U.S. Pours Gasoline on Gaza Fires
Once upon a time, Israelis and Palestinians looked to the U.S. to intervene at moments of heightened confrontation to mediate between the two sides and contain the damage. The Bush Administration, however, has proved entirely incapable of playing this role, because its own interventions are hidebou...Annals of Globalization
Honey, I Shrank the Superpower
In a snide reference to Bill Clinton's 1992 promise to "build a bridge into the 21st century," Barack Obama recently quipped that what Hillary Clinton really offers is a bridge back into the 20th century. Yet, a bridge back into the last century may be what all the major candidates are offering when...New York Moments
The Debka Made ‘Em Do ItFrom Tony's Archive
A Playground Lesson for Bush
How a spontaneous alliance of jocks, do-gooders and lesser bullies against the biggest bully at the school changed the balance of power at Milnerton Primary
2 Responses to “What Makes Groups ‘Special’?”
As a victim/veteran of eighteen months in the Nixon-Kissinger Fig Leaf Contingent (Vietnam 1970-72), I especially appreciate skeptical refusal to parrot military jargon.
Unfortunately, I find the necessary skepticism largely ineffective when unaccompanied by a translation into understandable, equivalent terminology. For example: when the U.S. military mis-characterized purposefully provocative tank races through mosque graveyards in Najaf (Iraq) as “Force Oriented Zone Reconnaissance,” I immediately substituted “patrolling” and/or “picking a fight.”
I think that the erstwhile free-thinker has to creatively develop over time an alternative vocabulary for ready deployment against Orwellian military jargon. Instead of President Eisenhower’s now-quaint “Military-Industrial Complex,” I like to use “Warfare Welfare” and “Make-work Militarism.” For the entire military/bureaucratic nightmare imperialism run amok I like to employ the formulaic expression PARKINSON’S LAW + THE PETER PRINCIPLE = LUNATIC LEVIATHAN. And so on and so forth.
Again, I appreciate the well-deserved skepticism of mind-numbing military Doublethink/Duckspeaking, but I appreciate even more the antidote of clear and creative synonymous alternatives.
Excellent item & comment; sorry I didn’t see it earlier. It is essential to keep tearing away at the fakery and murky language constantly used to camouflage the reality, not just of the various wars but of all the activities this government has foisted upon people inside and outside its domain. Perceptive observers are not fooled by the obsession with euphemism and obfuscating double talk required of all the pompous spokes-creeps, military and civilian, who peddle their official wares, but as Tony and Mr Murry rightly say, it is the absorption and regurgitation of the terminology and cover-language by journalists and the public which has been far more insidious.
May I quote some crucial words written down in Dresden in 1946 by Victor Klemperer in his “philologist’s notebook”, LTI—Lingua Tertii Imperii (The Language of the Third Reich): “What was the most powerful Hitlerian propaganda tool?…the most powerful influence was exerted neither by individual speeches nor by articles or flyers, posters or flags; it was not achieved by things which one had to absorb by conscious thought or conscious emotions. Instead, Nazism permeated the flesh and blood of the people through single words, idioms and sentence structures which were imposed on them in a million repetitions and taken on board mechanically and unconsciously. ..But language does not simply write and think for me, it also increasingly dictates my feelings and governs my entire spiritual being the more unquestiongly and unconsciously I abandon myself to it. And what happens if the cultivated language is made up of poisonous elements or has been made the bearer of poisons? Words can be like tiny doses of arsenic: they are swallowed unnoticed, appear to have no effect, and then after a little time the toxic reaction sets in after all….”
Of course I do not advocate the misuse of “historical parallels”, especially when completely inapplicable, as for eg., the “always 1938 in Munich” obsession of neo-con fantasy Churchills battling the appeaser windmills etc ad nauseam, but one doesn’t have to ignore the true lessons of the past just because some present-day malefactors misappropriate “History” for themselves.
Leave a Reply