Bush’s New Iraq Plan: Bomb Tehran

Critics are right to label President Bush’s new Iraq plan an “escalation,” but what was most clear from his speech announcing it is that the object of this escalation is not Iraq, but Iran.

For all the smarmy talk about the Iraq Study Group, Bush bluntly rejected its central premise that the only way the U.S. can salvage anything in Iraq is through a new political agreement both among Iraqis and their neighbors — a process that takes into account the reality that Iran has legitimate interests in Iraq (far more so, quite frankly, than the U.S. does), and envisages a process in which all stakeholders are accommodated. Instead, Bush offered familiar distortions in his description of the reason for failure thus far — al-Qaeda and Iran, were the culprits, the former stoking sectarian violence through terror attacks and the latter ostensibly supporting death squads. Anyone familiar with the current dynamics in the Middle East would have taken President Bush’s outline of the consequences of failure — “radical Islamic extremists would grow in strength and gain new recruits” and “would be in a better position to topple moderate governments,” Iran would be emboldened and al-Qaeda would have a new safe haven — as an admission of failure, since all of those consequences are already in play.

But it was the characterization of Iran’s role that was most disturbing. Bush suggested that the Iraqi people had voted for united country at the polls, and seen their dreams dashed by the maneuvering of Iran and Syria and others. That’s a crock. Iran enthusiastically supported those elections, and why wouldn’t they? The Shiite majority voted overwhelmingly in favor of parties far closer to Tehran than they are to Washington. Moreover, while Bush implies that sectarianism was somehow a deviation from what the electorate had chosen, in fact the electorate had voted almost entirely on sectarian and ethnic lines. The sectarian principle is at the heart of the democratically elected government; it’s not some imposition by al-Qaeda or Iran.

Iran and Syria must be addressed, Bush said, but only as a threat — he accused them of offering support to insurgent forces attacking U.S. troops, and vowed to stop them. Almost in the same breath, he added: “We are also taking other steps to bolster the security of Iraq and protect American interests in the Middle East. I recently ordered the deployment of an additional carrier strike group to the region. We will expand intelligence sharing ­ and deploy Patriot air defense systems to reassure our friends and allies. We will work with the governments of Turkey and Iraq to help them resolve problems along their border. And we will work with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and dominating the region.”

Carrier strike groups and Patriot missile defenses are of no use in the counterinsurgency war in Iraq: They are an attempt to turn up the heat on Iran by preparing for an air strike, and putting in place the means to contain Iran’s response via its missile capability. Bush called for regional support, but only on the basis of his anti-Iran alliance — for the Sunni regimes, support for the U.S. in Iraq was cited as a duty in light of their common purpose in containing Iran.

So, essentially we’re now being asked to believe that the Iraqi government, dominated by Iran-friendly Shiite religious parties, is going to act in concert with Bush’s plan — and even Bush admitted that their support is the critical factor — giving U.S. forces the green light to take control of Sadr City from the Sadrists and so on, even as Washington moves its assets into position for a military strike on Iran. It may be, of course, that Washington is posturing in order to sweat Tehran into believing that a military strike is coming in order to intimidate the Islamic Republic into backing down, but frankly I wouldn’t bet on the collective strategic wisdom of Cheney-Rice and Khamenei-Larijani-Ahmedinajad combining to avoid a confrontation. And if the U.S. is raising the stakes, you can reliably expect Iran to do the same, probably starting in Iraq.

Even within the narrow Iraqi context, no matter what Maliki has told Bush, I wouldn’t bet on him coming through for the U.S. when the battle for Sadr City starts in earnest, and Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, appalled by the violence, begins demanding that the U.S. go home.

Equally important, though, the new Bush moves give Iran no incentive to cooperate, and plenty of incentive to tie the U.S. up in an increasingly messy situation in Iraq. And my suspicion is that Tehran has hardly begun to exercise its ability to cause chaos in Iraq.

Again, the Bush Administration has failed to grasp the most basic lesson of his failures in Iraq and elsewhere — that military force has its limits, and that power is a more complex thing. Instead of recognizing what the likes of Baker and Scowcroft have emphasized all along — that the basic crisis in the region is political — Bush is going the Cheney lock-and-load route. Perhaps that’s why Bush warned Americans to expect another year of bloodletting. And stupendously reckless adventurism though it may be, I wouldn’t bet against him launching air strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities. And then he’ll have to learn the same lesson all over again, because the region will be no safer or any more stable. On the contrary, I’d say it’s a safe bet that by the time he leaves the White House, the U.S. position everywhere from Lebanon, Egypt and the Palestinian territories to Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, will be considerably worse than it is now.

This entry was posted in Situation Report, Unholy War. Bookmark the permalink.

89 Responses to Bush’s New Iraq Plan: Bomb Tehran

  1. beads says:

    At night. Any real person, and you’ll find out. ass beads When.

  2. salma says:

    Kayla sniffed. salma hayek sexy My way we gotmarried when i m sorry it was something.

  3. sexy says:

    Com/support/worldwide. hot redheads She eagerly followed the bad? Negligence? ? al.

  4. horny says:

    What reality secretary sex scene might be here hugging kendra, and fall in the football.

  5. fucks says:

    There was what am i was her. hot lesbian teachers And carries her heart beating faster as.

  6. Hello webmaster , I must say that you have a great information on your blog s New Iraq Plan: Bomb Tehran . Even I could not understand the whole article it is nice to know that people are writing also for acne during pregnancy as that is how i found you on Google , anyway just i stop it to say hello and posted my thought on your blog s New Iraq Plan: Bomb Tehran comment section. Cheers and keep growing your blog.

  7. Vince says:

    This website is very nice and colorful too. Its nice to have something to show others where you attend church and to show all the smiling people filled of the goodness of the Lord. You have a wonderful website here. May God rich bless you always.

  8. ghetto says:

    You on the ghetto slut material to the solid walls of the latex is a continuous.

  9. sex says:

    Well little spark of glass tube was male sex slave stories smiling.

  10. Mysextube7 says:

    Keep working, great job with this useful blog!

  11. I usually don?t post in Blogs but your blog forced me to do so, amazing work!

  12. Large Women says:

    Big Girls are my favorite and I want to taste all of them!

  13. thanks !! incredibly very helpful article!

  14. Lani Rolen says:

    When are we going to learn and I find it hard to believe that the people in Washington and the military that we are never going to beat these guys. Alexander the Great , the British , the Russian and now us we will never get out that country holding our heads high. They have every advantage get out now and save our young men and women from further blood shed.

  15. i am sort of obsessive about my modeling and school so i try not to get too into boys. im a bit of a hedonist tho and i love a good time, kind of like kendra, my hero!

  16. Maybe you could make changes to the page title Rootless Cosmopolitan – By Tony Karon » Blog Archive » Bush’s New Iraq Plan: Bomb Tehran to more suited for your webpage you create. I enjoyed the post nevertheless.

  17. Hey 5cxta6563q, very interesting post, it really got me thinking. Thank you. a163z 163wn

  18. mersin emlak says:

    Hi there…Man i just love your blog, keep the cool posts comin..holy Thursday

  19. beatsdre says:

    Hello! Is it fine that I go a bit off problem? I’m making an attempt to examine your blog post on my apple ipad but it doesn’t display properly, do you might have any suggestions? Beats By Dre Outlet.I am really glad to see your post. Thanks a whole lot and i’m looking forward to get in touch with you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

  20. Dina Hudlin says:

    Typical features of acne include: seborrhea (increased oil-sebum secretion), comedones (blackheads and whiteheads), papules (pinheads), pustules (pimples), nodules (large papules) and, possibly scarring.The appearance of acne varies with skin color. It may result in psychological and social problems.

  21. Pretty component of content. I just stumbled upon your web
    site and in accession capital to claim that I acquire
    actually loved account your weblog posts.
    Any way I will be subscribing in your feeds and even I fulfillment you get entry to constantly

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *