RSSU.S. and Gadhafi: Oil is Forgiven
If President Bush’s immigration speech was an attempt to divert attention from his failures in Iraq, then Condi Rice’s announcement this week that the U.S. would restore diplomatic ties with Libya — and that Iran and North Korea should take note — may have been a useful distraction of attention from the fact that in the course of a single week, she’d suffered two significant diplomatic setbacks (on the quest for Iran sanctions and on the attempt to financially throttle the Palestinian Authority). Most of the media seemed to lap up her explanation that Libya had been suddenly cowed by the U.S. invasion of Iraq into renouncing terrorism, WMD and seeking to rehabilitate itself in the international community.
That revisionist account, of course, ignores the fact that Libya had been strenuously attempting to restore ties with the West for more than a decade — that was the intention of all those talks over taking responsibility for Lockerbie, which were mediated by the South Africans in the mid 1990s. Libya had longsince begged off sponsoring terror attacks against the West, although part of the Colonel’s grand ambition to style himself as a Pan-African liberator had seen him back some of the most vicious war criminals (think Charles Taylor or Foday Sankoh) that the continent has ever seen. Yes, it was only in 2003 that Gadhafi declared his nuclear program and shipped it off to Washington. But that simply completed a process that had already begun years before, during the Clinton administration.
What much of the reporting of the story seems to have overlooked, however, is that there was an intense lobbying effort from the mid 1990s onward by the U.S. oil industry to rehabilitate Libya and lift sanctions so that U.S. companies could take the lead in upgrading Libya’s aging infrastructure and get a jump on the competition for drilling rights.
You have to figure that since those days, the oil price has increased four-fold, and consequently the incentive. (The Bush administration has already lifted the sanctions, restoring diplomatic ties is a symbolic icing on the cake.) That’s probably why Gadhafi has been entirely rehabilitated despite being the same old flaky despot he always was. (Ripley’s Believe it Or Not take note: What constitutional leadership position does Gadhafi hold in Libya? That’s right, none at all.) It’s not as if he’s suddenly holding elections or allowing freedom of speech and the press. He’s just become your garden variety friendly oil-autocrat.
And as for Condi saying this is the model for Iran and North Korea, I wonder if that bit of flakkery was run through the “careful of what you wish for” policy test: Libya, in negotiations with the U.S. and others, satisfied Western concerns over terrorism and WMD, and was then rehabilitated to the point of diplomatic relations, i.e. it got security guarantees. Regime-change was taken off the table, even though by Bush’s measure, Gadhafi’s regime is presumably no more legitimate that Ayatollah Khamenei’s. Libya is arguably less democratic than Iran. So, does Rice’s comment suggest that the U.S. is about to take regime-change off the table if the Iranians negotiate in good faith to satisfy Western concerns over nuclear proliferation and terrorism? If so, that would be a dramatic turnabout on the part of the Bush Administration, which rebuffed an Iranian offer to do just that in 2003. Something tells me, though, that it was more likely simply a rhetorical flourish from a Secretary of State whose record suggest she’s a lot better at PR than she is at diplomacy.
The Latest
Guest Columns
How I Overcame My Jewish-Evangelical Upbringing and Learned to Love Christmas, Anyway
Guest Column: Gavin Evans Back in the day, when Gavin and I were young activists trying to change the world, the doorbell rang at our Observatory student house. I opened it to see a tall and handsome man in the silky purple shirt and dog collar of an Anglican Bishop. "You must be Tony," said Bis...Featured Analysis
Does Obama Have a Mideast Plan B?
It's hardly surprising that President Barack Obama chose to schedule a White House visit by Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the dead of night on Monday, because right now Obama has little to show for his 10-month effort to revive a Middle East peace process. The Israeli leader's refu...Unholy War
Who Lost Fatah?
‘Who lost China?” was the battle cry of a witch-hunt conducted in the US State Department following the 1949 victory of Mao Zedong’s communists. The department’s “China hands”, critics charged, had been woefully ignorant of the dynamics at work on the ground in China after the Second W...A Skeptical Read
More Iran Hysteria from the NY Times
The surest sign that another neocon bill of goods is being hawked in respect of the Iran "nuclear peril" is the revival of Rumsfeld-esque "unknowable unknowns", a la Iraq WMD panic circa late 2002. In the real world, of course, solid progress is being made towards a plausible diplomatic deal to ...99c Blogging
The 'Metrics' of Obama's Vietnam
Why is the Administration conducting a "test run" for its metrics of success in Afghanistan? Because the metrics used will be those that provide the desired verdictHear! Hear!
Helena Cobban Explains FatahIf I Was a Blogger...
More Dennis Ross Dissembling
Obama's Iran point man can't seem to get his head around the reasons for Israeli emigrationA Wondering Jew
Obama, Foxman and Israel's Purpose
Having spent decades drumming home the idea that Israel is rooted squarely in the Holocaust experience, and should be viewed by the world as the state of the survivors, Israelis and some of their most fervent backers in the U.S. are suddenly insisting that this is a misleading, even hostile idea.Glancing Headers
The Shebab, the Shahids and the Champion's League Final
The Shebab gunman on the left appears to be a Gunner, i.e. an Arsenal fan... In honor of today's Champion's League final, I republish my op ed that ran in the National a year ago. What was most fascinating about the photograph of the Somali gunman who was part of the crowd dragging the body...Annals of Globalization
The Shebab, the Shahids and the Champion's League Final
The Shebab gunman on the left appears to be a Gunner, i.e. an Arsenal fan... In honor of today's Champion's League final, I republish my op ed that ran in the National a year ago. What was most fascinating about the photograph of the Somali gunman who was part of the crowd dragging the body...The Whole World's Africa
Congo's Not Africa's WWI, It's Worse Than That
If there is a European analogy to be applied in the Congo, it would be the brutal Thirty Year War in Germany that ended in 1648Shameless Cronyism
Embedded with the Jihadis
My crazy friend Nir Rosen goes on embed with the Taliban, and finds out just why the U.S. can't win in AfghanistanRebellion Into Money
Why Joe Strummer Was a Socialist
Hint: It had nothing to do with bailing out banksCould Die Laughing
Whatever Became of that Nice Mr. Blair...
The problem with a global conversation between Muslims and Christians refereed by Tony Blair? Two words: Tony Blair.The 51st State
A Teachable Moment in Basra
It should come as no surprise that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's disastrous offensive against the Mahdi Army of Moqtada Sadr in Basra has had the exact opposite effect of that intended -- strengthening rather than weakening Sadr, and making clear that he, and the Iranians, have far greater in...Futures Market
Will Russia Partition Kosovo?
Why my tea-leaf reading suggests that Moscow has a nasty surprise in store for Washington in the BalkansCuisine
Yummy yummy Umami
Why a leftover lamb bone turned a bean stew into an ecstatic eventHousekeeping
'Lost' Entries on Rootless Cosmopolitan
Previous entries that now register as "not available" are ones that got left behind in a server migration. We're working on retrieving themNew York Moments
The Debka Made ‘Em Do ItFrom Tony's Archive
A Playground Lesson for Bush
How a spontaneous alliance of jocks, do-gooders and lesser bullies against the biggest bully at the school changed the balance of power at Milnerton Primary
7 Responses to “U.S. and Gadhafi: Oil is Forgiven”
Now that Gadhafi is our buddy, Bono, editor, missed a great opportunity to inform us of his musical tastes. Instead we’re treated to Condi’s top 10 list in the Independent. It’s a bit of a letdown. I mean, the youngest act is.. U2 (who would’ve guessed?). No Toby Keith?
Condi, Condi, let me help you with your PR. If you want to be hip, be the pulse, connect, etc, forget Elton John. Try, I don’t know… the Dixie Chicks or the latest by someone once friendly to your cause: Neil Young’s Living with War. I’m sure that’s what’s playing on Uncle Gadhafi’s iPod at the moment.
In Gadhafi’s i-Pod? Hmmm. I’m not sure why, but I’d peg Gadhafi for a Paolo Conte fan. Gelato a’Limon; Gelato a’Limon… I can see him muttering melodiously to himself. And the Italian connection is there in the colonial legacy… And then I can see him going for some kitschy Balkan techno, too. A bit of MC Hammer. And maybe Roy Orbison. And Percy Sledge’s greatest hits. Just guessing here. And, of course, the late great Brenda Fassie, South Africa’s answer to Madonna, with whom he cuddled for the cameras a couple of years back… “I’m your, I’m your, weekend special…”
Actually, Elton John may have been a meeting of minds…
Her EJ selection is “Rocket Man”! Talk about Shock and Awe envy.
For Gadhafi I wonder if Cicciolina could do Body and Soul. And if she can’t, she can always drop the “soul” part and be all she can be.
I think Tony Bliar has one of several All is Forgiven tracks in his iPod.
I have this sneaking suspicion that Condi is a brilliant satire of herself. No?
“He’s just become your garden variety friendly oil-autocrat.”
At a town-hall meeting prior to the war, I asked Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Rep. Ray LaHood (R-IL) whether we would stop supporting dictators after we toppled Saddam Hussein.
Neither politician answered the question, but rather left it up to a university professor who also sat on the panel. The prof said we would not, and neither politician challenged his remarks.
Bottom line: The war was never about WMD or Hussein killing his own people. The Iraq war is about our interests. Not Iraq’s.
Leave a Reply