RSSGame Over for Bush’s War of Ideas
The media loves to wring its collective hands over each new droning video sermon released by Osama bin Laden or Ayman Zawahiri, but it is the release — to unprecedented box office success — of the Turkish movie “Valley of the Wolves: Iraq” that heralds the failure of the Bush administration to win the “battle of ideas” that is has insisted is so central to its “global war on terror.” The reason is simple: The average Joe everywhere from France to China, and all of the developing world, pretty much loathes U.S. foreign policy; but even in hotbeds of anti-American sentiment nothing quite matches the entertainment allure of American action movies. Al Qaeda’s video production values are no match for those of Jerry Bruckheimer, but “Valley of the Wolves” signals a shift — now audiences in the Muslim world (and beyond) can find a Bruckheimer-esque package of thrills, explosions and near misses, and vicious goons whose diabolical deeds crank up the audience for emotionally satisfying revenge fantasies in which the Rambo types deliver the bad guys their comeuppance — except that this time, the bad guys are the U.S. military; the wronged innocents are Iraqis; and the avengers are Turkish special forces going to war with their NATO ally. (You can get a sense of the movie’s narrative, and watch some clips if you can get them to play in your browser, on the movie’s web site.) In other words, American-style action flicks need no longer be a guilty pleasure for the angry youth of the Muslim world; now there’s a genre of action movie that resonates with their world view.
Indeed, Turkish prime minister Erdogan is reported to have seen the movie and recommended it to friends, while his wife attended a premiere and described it as “a beautiful film.”
An Abu Ghraib scene is staged for ‘Wolves’
You can already imagine the Turkish producers weighing up sequels: A Turkish Rambo blows up Israel’s West Bank wall and restores Palestinian access to Jerusalem, or a Turkish James Bond character infiltrates the Danish press and uncovers a neo-Nazi conspiracy to use cartoons to provoke a war between Islam and the West. The possibilities are endless.
And let’s not even talk about “The Night Baghdad Fell,” an Egyptian satire that is drawing record crowds to Cairo’s cinema’s with its depiction of a U.S. invasion of Egypt. (I’d hesitate a guess, here, that at least some of those are repeat-viewers desperate for a second look at the movie’s sexual fantasy scene involving U.S. Secretary of State Condi Rice as a bellydancer — spare us the action figures…)
It is not just the fact of these movies, but their commercial success that indicates just how badly the Bush administration has lost the battle of ideas in the Muslim world. Muslim civil society appears to be hungry for an emotionally-satisfying revenge fantasy to release the anger that has built up over everything from Iraq to the Danish cartoons, and they’ll pay to see movies that deliver. The commercial logic of the movie industry suggests that “Valley of the Wolves” may spawn a genre.
The Latest
Hear! Hear!
Bush's 'Peace' Effort Imperils Peace
Daniel Levy explains why the farcical negotiations between Olmert and Abbas actually undermine the prospects for Mideast peaceFeatured Analysis
About That 'New' Middle East...
Could there be a more perfect image of the catastrophic self-inflicted rout suffered by U.S. Middle East policy under President George W. Bush? This week, the President will party with Israel's leaders celebrating their country's 60th anniversary -- and champion a phony peace process whose explici...A Skeptical Read
Beheading Barack
First, he couldn't be President because he's Muslim. Now, we're told, he can't be President because he's not Muslim enough!Shameless Cronyism
Sound Advice for the Next President
To grasp the challenge facing U.S. foreign policy, read Helena Cobban's new book Engage!A Wondering Jew
Israel is 60, Zionism is Dead, What Now?
Israel at 60 is an intractable historical fact. It has one of the world's strongest armies, without peer in the Middle East, and its 200 or so nuclear warheads give it the last word in any military showdown with any of its neighbors. Palestinian militants may be able to make life in certain parts...99c Blogging
All Hat, No Cattle #7682
President Bush loves playing the Bad Cop, but anyone vaguely familiar with the routine knows not to take the Bad Cop seriously.The 51st State
A Teachable Moment in Basra
It should come as no surprise that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's disastrous offensive against the Mahdi Army of Moqtada Sadr in Basra has had the exact opposite effect of that intended -- strengthening rather than weakening Sadr, and making clear that he, and the Iranians, have far greater in...Futures Market
Will Russia Partition Kosovo?
Why my tea-leaf reading suggests that Moscow has a nasty surprise in store for Washington in the BalkansGuest Columns
Iraq and U.S. Faith in Violence
Guest Column: Alastair Crooke warns of a dangerous fantasy that persists in Western capitals in which the West faces an "onslaught" from "radical Islam." The problem is that this intersects all too tragically with a the persistent belief in Washington and elsewhere that by applying its overwhel...Cuisine
Yummy yummy Umami
Why a leftover lamb bone turned a bean stew into an ecstatic eventGlancing Headers
Spare Us More 'Globalization & Football'
The claim that Egypt's Cup of Nations win "proves" that stronger domestic leagues make stronger international sides is not born out by football's bigger picture. In fact, the teams that do best internationally are those with weaker domestic leaguesHousekeeping
'Lost' Entries on Rootless Cosmopolitan
Previous entries that now register as "not available" are ones that got left behind in a server migration. We're working on retrieving themUnholy War
U.S. Pours Gasoline on Gaza Fires
Once upon a time, Israelis and Palestinians looked to the U.S. to intervene at moments of heightened confrontation to mediate between the two sides and contain the damage. The Bush Administration, however, has proved entirely incapable of playing this role, because its own interventions are hidebou...The Whole World's Africa
South Africa's Racist Present
Guest Column: Sean Jacobs. What to make of the racist torture incident at a South African campusAnnals of Globalization
Honey, I Shrank the Superpower
In a snide reference to Bill Clinton's 1992 promise to "build a bridge into the 21st century," Barack Obama recently quipped that what Hillary Clinton really offers is a bridge back into the 20th century. Yet, a bridge back into the last century may be what all the major candidates are offering when...Could Die Laughing
Mearsheimer, Walt and the Erudite Hysteria of David RemnickNew York Moments
The Debka Made ‘Em Do ItFrom Tony's Archive
A Playground Lesson for Bush
How a spontaneous alliance of jocks, do-gooders and lesser bullies against the biggest bully at the school changed the balance of power at Milnerton PrimaryRebellion Into Money
The Rebel Grace of Patti Smith
8 Responses to “Game Over for Bush’s War of Ideas”
. . . and into this mess now gallops the feckless Karen Hughes to spread her good cheer about US intentions in the Muslim World (and did I indeed read that she’s going with no journalists in tow?). And Bush is soon off to visit Pakistan, where tens of thousands demonstrated today to protest the Danish cartoons? I suppose that to cancel or postpone such long-planned visits would hardly seem manly to an administration that prizes in its diplomats - even its female ones - a kind of rhetorical testosterone (I can barely picture Condi Rice as a belly-dancer, though I’ll keep trying) - but isn’t Ms Hughes now pretty well set up to be punching bag?
Punching bag, indeed, but as I wrote last summer on Hughes’ mission, the administration has actually recognized that the fundamental problem is not that the Muslim world misunderstands U.S. policies, but rather the actual policies themselves. The administration grants that 80 percent of the Muslim world is intractably opposed to those policies, so their target is to influence the other 20 percent (who presumably can be seduced into embracing the U.S. despite its policies!) Even then, it doesn’t seem to be working, does it? If the makers of Hollywood-mimic action movies have now started making the U.S. the diabolical bad guys, it’s not hard to imagine that Karen Hughes’ vacuous homilies about Americans loving their children, just like Turks and Arabs so, are not exactly going to win hearts and minds.
Goes to show that humiliation remains one of the most powerful forces in human nature. Bush treats the Muslim world with dripping condescension. To dispatch the monumentally ignorant Karen Hughes to the middle east to preach about the goodness of American values would be like sending George Bush to the annual convention of the Modern Language Association to lecture about prosody. Staged buffoonery.
Right. And frankly, from what I’ve seen, Condi isn’t much better. She’s a more competent PR person than Hughes, but my sense is that she makes Madeleine Albright (the quintessential megaphone diplomat) seem like a good listener. And as you say, the administration’s style is to lecture everybody and tout this vacuous slogans and hopelessly simplistic positions. I have no doubt that those whom she meets in the Middle East and Europe have a hard time taking Rice any more seriously than they’d take Hughes. They have to indulge her, of course, because of the power she represents, but I’d say her ability to persuade anyone in the region to follow the US lead on anything is negligible. It’s patently obvious, for example, that on the IAEA, they only managed to get the support of the likes of India by a combination of threats and bribes. And they constantly mistake other countries decisions to act in their own interests in concert with the US as support for its positions, e.g. China in relation to North Korea. Which means they never seem to take account of the limits of that cooperation, and where those countries diverge with the U.S. — as has been the case on North Korea, where China’s agenda is quite different from Washington’s, and will be the case on Iran, too — and certainly on how to deal with Hamas.
It’s not just Bush’s sophomoronic “vision thing” which is pusing Turkey back into anti-Western hatred. It is also the millenia long religious schisms of a Europe mired in it’s history. It is a major tragedy because Turkey is the best hope in the Islamic Near East for a modern and democratic state.
Attaturk broke the power of the mullahs to establish a secular modern state. Erdogan has earnestly and as far as I can tell honestly implemented economic and human rights reforms in pursuit of EU membership. This kind of integration is by far the best hope for spreading tolerance, stability, prosperity and thus democracy. Bush’s unilateralism and parochial militarism prevents him from understanding this, and the right wing Barvarian Catholicism of the CDU/CSU thrives on schism and resulting conflict.
My Army friend who went to Istanbul for the weekend found the Turks to be extremely welcoming, and also noted that when he asked about the movie, everyone around agreed that it was very silly. At least that’s a slight positive.
As for the negatives, you are spot on about Condi Rice. Tony, I was half expecting a post on her new announcement of aid to the Iranian opposition and how it’s a complete boondoggle. To openly link your desired outcome with American support is perhaps the stupidest thing that could be done in the Middle East. Subtlety, anyone?
Yeah, Pat, you’re right about that. It’s a kiss of death for anyone to accept that money, and not only because of the response of the authorities. There’s a strong nationalist sentiment at work right now because of the nuke issue. But when I read that announcement, I just laughed — anyone remember the $198 million allocated to Iraqi democracy projects in the late 1990s? Most of it went unspent, much of what was spent went to fund the likes of Chalabi, and look where that got anyone…
Hi Tony, You just Know that Condi (anyone out there remember a comic strip called Dondi?), has SHOES to match her “belly dancing” ensemble. Have you noticed how W manages his flock? Even the really savvy people are put into jobs unsuited to their talents,or knowledge base. Condi,Chertoff, W, Brownie etc. Karen Hughes is nearly as tactless as W. She was his personal Press Blocker, chosen because she is an overbearing personality,surprised that she wasn’t sent to the U N. Your columns are timeless!
Leave a Reply