Another ‘Flesh Wound’ for Chalabi

Remember that scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail in which the Black Knight loses three limbs in a sword fight and ends up hopping around on one leg, insisting that he’s suffered only a flesh wound, and insisting that he will smite his assailant, King Arthur? Well, if the knight’s name had been Ahmed Chalabi and the setting Iraq, some sections of the U.S. media would likely have faithfully reported it something like this: “Dismembered Knight set for Improbable Comeback.”

A few weeks ago, no less an esteemed outlet than the Washington Post would have had us believe that Ahmed Chalabi was a serious contender for prime minister of Iraq — and this after almost everything of consequence that Chalabi had told the U.S. media had proven to be bogus. Nor were they the only ones: The story of Chalabi’s imminent resurgence was all over the media. Presumably this because Chalabi himself was telling them this, and his backers at the Pentagon – who’re never going to admit defeat – were underscoring it. “Highly placed sources say he has become the choice of many U.S. officials to lead the country,” the Post reported. Indeed, as he had been before the invasion. And somehow the Washington Post and a number of other titles that really should know better have not yet fully grasped the reality that the U.S. rarely gets its way on the ground in Iraq. Chalabi, for the record, garnered so few votes in the December 15 elections that his list may not get a single seat in parliament. As ever, it seems, Chalabi wields far more influence along the Potomac than he does along the Euphrates.

This entry was posted in 99c Blogging. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Another ‘Flesh Wound’ for Chalabi

  1. There was a legendary tv weatherman in the 60s who, before he passed away, revealed the secret of his trade: “See what the weather is today and predict the same for tomorrow.”

    On that basis alone, the NYT, WaPo, etc, could have nailed the Dec15 election (Juan Cole did, simply by analyzing the previous elections), but such is the genius of their sources that they managed to get it all wrong (even without the help of Judy Miller).

    For example, Michael Rubin (of Neocon central, AEI) predicted 5% for Chalabi and 20% for Allawi.

    The amazing thing is not just that the media should still be listening to these guys, but that they guys are still listening to themselves!

  2. You are the clever guy. Get to the right point Tony Karon.

  3. lala says:

    your post give me more information on this topic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *