Late last year, after Musab al-Zarqawi’s group bombed hotels in Jordan, I wrote that the move would widen the rift between Zarqawi and the nationalist-Baathist leadership of the Iraq insurgency. It was already clear back then that the U.S. was negotiating with the latter element, and that these guys would have happily killed Zarqawi themselves as part of any long-term compact.
The Baathists are unlikely to stand by and watch their own interests imperiled by those who would seek to make Iraq a new headquarters for terror attacks across the Middle East. Their objective, after all, is to restore some version of a regime detested by al Qaeda.
And with everyone from Ayman Zawahiri to the Baathists alarmed by his appetite for snuff videos that repulsed even most insurgent sympathizers, and also his strategy of wanton murder of Shiites, he was being increasingly sidelined in the insurgent leadership.
The fact that the U.S. managed to find and kill Zarqawi the day after the new Iraqi government released 2,500 insurgent-sympathizers from prison (they were greeted and given money by leaders of the main Sunni party in parliament), announced a reintegration of Baathists into political society, and appointed a Sunni former Baathist general as defense minister seems to suggest that some sort of deal has been done. Obviously, the elimination of Zarqawi is not going to end the insurgency or stop a civil war. But it may be a sign that the U.S. and its allies in Iraq have reached a new understanding that rehabilitates the Baathists, which would likely split the insurgency and isolate the Qaeda element. Now, the question is whether the U.S. can hold the most powerful Shiite parties on board after tilting its policy back towards the Baathists. Much may depend on the state of play between Washington and Tehran. And on that front, so far so good. (More on this soon.)
Zarqawi was too much of a psychopath, it seems. He’d begun to attacks Sunnis in Fallujah and probably crossed the red line.
Re. a US -Baathist rapprochement, it’s been my sense that unambiguous US support of the Shias has been the only brakes on a full-fledged civil war. Iran is watching, and if they don’t like what they see, US effort at sectarian triangulation might be too clever by half.
No doubt this is tied to the US doing a 180 on talking to the Iranians and possibly allowing enrichment.
Smacks of desperation, doesn’t it?
Well, yes, desperation in the sense that they don’t have any other option on Iran — I think the reason they’re talking is that they’ve finally digested the fact that regime-change is a bridge too far, and unless they achieve a framework for stabilizing relations with the regime in Tehran, the Bush administration could find itself presiding over a defeat in the Middle East that would reverse much of the post-WW II U.S. hegemony in the region
There was an article in last month’s Le Monde, which suggested an Iraqification of Tanzim al-Qaida had been taking place recently, with its local leadership now being Iraqis:
“This new generation is a mixture of fervent young Iraqis and opportunistic vagrants. They are generally far less predictable and more violent than their predecessors. The US obsession with al-Qaida in Iraq has only made the organisation more dangerous, by accelerating its Iraqification and allowing it to put down deep local roots. Tanzim al-Qaida has shown that it can successfully adapt by finding local replacements for apparently heavy losses in a short time.”
The whole article is worth reading:
http://mondediplo.com/2006/05/02irak
Thanks Markus, I’ll take a look
I hate spammers! (
best class 10 memory card reviews
Egypt’s leading newspaper Al-Ahram, Egypt, Israel, from the point of breaking relations with Turkey to apologize dilemedi?i analysis of why he apologized. Israel is a country for the first time since its establishment in 1948 apologizing to the statistics proposed in the article was interesting Kato’nun strategist Gen. Abdul Muni.
Mutual respect between the two countries, indicating that there is a relationship of transparency and away from the tensions of Kato, the recent developments in the region is also the Camp David Agreement between the two countries forced the vitality of Israel to take such a step, he noted. According to 5 years in the hands of Hamas if Gilad Kato’ya bulunan?srailli
Another major factor in the rescue with the help of Shalit, Egypt.
Former Governor of North Sinai, the Kato, “Turkey and Egypt and Israel after the Palestinian Authority did not want to stretch the ropes.” commented. Who accept the murder of Israeli soldiers is wrong Kato’ya göreM?s?rl?, or pay compensation for those who died subsequently.
According Kato’ya the future you will be aware of the power of Egypt, Israel, which was a much more effective in the region, the region does not want to live in the Camp David Agreement, the removal of the rack.
Chairman of the Shura Council Mustafa al fucky former Foreign Relations Committee in the latest developments in the region and Syria underlined that the issue of pushing Israel to take such a step. A comparison between Turkey and Egypt, pointing out that doing wrong buddy used the following expressions: “I have a border with Egypt, Israel. In addition, the Camp David Agreement of 1979 between the two country’s, and Israel does not want the deterioration of relations between the two countries.”
Similar expressions fucky voicing hand, in that both countries are active in the past sava?mas?n?n said. Hand fucky also lowers the level of Turkey’s relations with Israel also said koparmad???n? represented only between the two countries and underlined the continued military and economic relations.
Hello, i think that i saw you visited my site so i came to “return
the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to improve my site!I suppose its
ok to use a few of your ideas!!